radio talk show host glenn beck

CNN's Glenn Beck once asked. "Am I turning into account O'Reilly? I really — I don't want to be that guy." After today that may be impossible: the radio host who insists he's a regular joe is poised to collect a blockbuster monetary windfall. Beck has famously made his opinions on monied celebrities abundantly clear having tossed barbs their way as recently as two weeks ago when California wildfires burned down the homes of those he termed "America haters." But the from the ' Brian Stelter — that Premiere communicate Networks will announce a contract extension with Beck to the tune of "$50 million over five years through a combination of salary and profit-sharing from syndication" — indicates that the "if you can't beat 'em join 'em" maxim ordain soon apply to the radio host. The deal is significant news because who knows? Maybe this is the last $50 million the radio industry has to spend having ceded merchandise share and the ability to draw up to their brethren in the satellite radio biz. What Beck has going for him is listener loyalty and some demographics unique to the talk radio bet. As Stelter notes. Beck's show skews younger and brings in "more females than most other talk-show hosts." In that sense. Beck's great works are coming to fruition. After all he once vowed: "I`m a guy. I speak for all men when we say we live to get women naked. Period." So let's recognize: Beck's got undeniable demo-delivering game. But he also delivers a heaping process of the choose of crazy that makes terrestrial radio something entirely extra-terrestrial. Keith Olbermann once said of Beck. "There's something about him that suggests one night he will say something that costs him his career in television." And he could be alter. Maybe he's sowing the seeds of his own transfer when he. "I figure why not just wipe out the entire human go by arming monkeys — sorry sorry simian-Americans — and that way we can alter everyone happy the baby-haters and the monkey-lovers you know?" Sheesh. Everyone knows that the simian-Americans listen to Imus. be to reply to a comment? Hint: move "say" at the furnish of thecomment; after being approved your comment ordain appear directly underneath thecomment you replied to

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/06/beck-reaps-50-million-wi_n_71327.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

CNN's Glenn Beck once asked. "Am I turning into account O'Reilly? I really — I don't want to be that guy." After today that may be impossible: the radio host who insists he's a regular joe is poised to collect a blockbuster monetary windfall. Beck has famously made his opinions on monied celebrities abundantly alter having tossed barbs their way as recently as two weeks ago when California wildfires burned down the homes of those he termed "America haters." But the from the ' Brian Stelter — that Premiere Radio Networks will announce a contract extension with Beck to the adjust of "$50 million over five years through a combination of salary and profit-sharing from syndication" — indicates that the "if you can't beat 'em join 'em" maxim ordain soon apply to the radio host. The broach is significant news because who knows? Maybe this is the last $50 million the radio industry has to spend having ceded market share and the ability to draw up to their brethren in the satellite radio biz. What Beck has going for him is listener loyalty and some demographics unique to the talk radio game. As Stelter notes. Beck's show skews younger and brings in "more females than most other talk-show hosts." In that sense. Beck's great works are coming to fruition. After all he once vowed: "I`m a guy. I speak for all men when we say we live to get women naked. Period." So let's accept: Beck's got undeniable demo-delivering game. But he also delivers a heaping dose of the choose of crazy that makes terrestrial radio something entirely extra-terrestrial. Keith Olbermann once said of Beck. "There's something about him that suggests one night he will say something that costs him his career in television." And he could be right. Maybe he's sowing the seeds of his own demise when he. "I figure why not just wipe out the entire human go by arming monkeys — sorry sorry simian-Americans — and that way we can make everyone happy the baby-haters and the monkey-lovers you know?" Sheesh. Everyone knows that the simian-Americans comprehend to Imus. Want to reply to a comment? Hint: move "say" at the furnish of thecomment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath thecomment you replied to

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/06/beck-reaps-50-million-wi_n_71327.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Bias is everywhere in the Washington affix. In the Sports section Monday a concluded with Dallas drubbing Philadelphia. 38-17 on Sunday night. The affix broke out its satirical whack-Limbaugh fasten: This bet was overshadowed a bit by Eagles instruct Andy Reid's family troubles. His two sons are in confine and a assail of Reid's house turned up so many pills that a judge described it as a As someone who has had his own high-profile problems with prescription drugs. go Limbaugh was asked to mention; he declared it a tragedy for Reid that Donovan McNabb was so overrated. Meanwhile in the New York Times the big new assure for Glenn Beck is greeted by the headline Brian Stelter began: On his daily radio talk show. Glenn Beck portrays himself as an add up guy a recovering alcoholic and a comedian who regularly injects gratify into his conservative politics. The alcoholism never reemerges as a topic in Stelter's otherwise straightforward (or considering the big bucks positive) conjoin. Throwing the "in recovery" lie in seems front-loaded and superfluous. Isn't a recovering alcoholic forever "in recovery" -- if he hasn't fallen off the wagon? It's worth noting that Beck can be candid about his personal problems which could be one way for a ego-loaded talk show host to show humility or one way for a conservative host to seek mercy from a liberal newspaper. But the Times didn't need to hype it desire that. Stelter's story also contains uncredited Media Matters items on his gaffes so the story doesn't seem too positive. I feel for Coach Reid. I went through the same thing with one of my sons.  They need to get the man alone. He has done nothing. That adjudicate that made the comment about the "drug emporuim" needs his ass kicked. He had no idea as to what went on in the Reid home. My son was very good at hiding his dope in our accommodate. We never open it. It was only after his time in confine and rehab when he showed us where it was. Right now there is nothing that instruct Reid can do. He can only see his sons for a bring together hours a week. It is a shame when we get wrapped up in our bring home the bacon and forget about the things at home but it happens. A coach in the NFL spends a lot more time with his players than his family. That is just the nature of the business. I could go on and on but I won't. What my son went through was hard on the whole family. I wish he never would undergo gotten involved with the shit but that is all behind us. He is again a productive part society. That is what matters most to me. As I posted measure night in Open go. It was stupid of the Sideline Tart (Andrea sompin'or'nother) to insinuate The NFLPA might be looking at this situation from a "manifold standard" viewpoint.  This after admitting the thought was planted by Sideline Andrea herself. She was just hoping there was a story angle just waiting to be created. I don't follow football but this sucks. What the heck is the point of bringing Rush Limbaugh into a bet summary? Oh. I get it. The writer fancies himself a "social commentator" to boot. And if the NY Times included "in recovery" every time it was relevant that would include about 90% of the people covered in their "movies" and "television" sections. Remember Olberloons "falling off the roof" comments that were "not directed at Max Mcgee? Well you might notice these comments were made after a football bet featuring (choose of) the object of Limbaugh's comments (Donovan McNabb) on Limbaugh's final appearance on Monday Night Football. bequeath Olberloons "falling off the roof" comments that were "not directed at Max Mcgee? And yes. I had forgotten about that. (forgive me while I do a "logic cast aside." ) OK. I certainly believe Olbermann that he was referring to an "inside joke" from his college days of which no one in his immediate vicinity or in the listening audience was aware. Doesn't everyone use "inside jokes" with people that undergo no roll? I anticipate Olberloon will have some merchandise figures handy the next measure he goes in pitching for a raise huh? Hey boss.  Over at CNN they're paying top Political analysts/satirists 10 Million a year.  anticipate I could get some of that action? It sounds like a line from David Letterman's opening monologue. So While I wouldn't cut them any slack. I think it was a joke.  Not a funny one but then liberal "gratify" never is. "Funny" is given even higher marks when the "humor" advance enslaves those it liberates.  This would be funny if it wasn't so adjust.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2007/11/05/washington-post-sports-section-mocks-limbaughs-drug-troubles

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Glenn Beck who hosts the third highest-rated national radio talk show in America has renewed his contract with Premiere Radio Networks. The Glenn Beck Program will continue to be heard on nearly 300 radio stations including affiliates in eight of the top 10 markets. Clear Channel: Los Angeles. Chicago. San Francisco. Dallas. Houston. Philadelphia. Washington. D. C. and Atlanta. The program’s nationwide Adults 25-54 audience has increased 15.9 percent in the last year (source: Arbitron. Nationwide. Spring 2006 – Spring 2007). Long-term advertisers some of which have been with the program since its launch into national syndication in 2002 include Select Comfort. Purina One and Proflowers com. Glenn Beck is host of his self-titled television show on Headline News publisher of Fusion - a monthly magazine that with tens of thousands of subscribers - and contributor to ABC’s Good Morning America. Premiere Radio Networks. Inc. is a subsidiary of Clear bring Communications and syndicates 90 radio programs and services to more than 4,600 radio affiliations.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2007/11/05/glenn-beck-extends-contract-with-premiere-radio-networks/?camp=rssfeed&src=mbp&type=textlink

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Part of this revelation came about due to what Ron Paul said about Beck and Beck’s treatment of Paul’s race for the presidency. This then is my current take on radio and TV talk show host and re-create performer. Glenn Beck. I evaluate Dr. Paul hit the nail on the continue when in a recent video (see below) he called Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly demagogues. I do not hear this call bantered around much so let me be it here as (from ). “a person especially an orator or political leader who gains cater and popularity by arousing the emotions passions and prejudices of the people.” Is that not Glenn Beck? approve in I opined that. “Listening to Glenn Beck is like a box of chocolates. Lately you never experience what you’re going to get. Sometimes he is such a frustrating simpleton and other times I’m yelling. ‘Yeah! You da man Beck!’” When I wrote that in early August I did not realize how I was being manipulated just that something did not add up. Now I do believe that Glenn Beck is very good at being a demagogue and the beauty of what he does is that you can support about 50 percent of what he says.  The other 50 percent is off somewhere else. Beck’s demagogy is at least in move due to his addictive personality (apparently he is a non-imbibing alcoholic by his own admission) his being diagnosed as having ADD (Attention Deficit disturb) and the mix of Mormon. Conservative and Republican backgrounds. 1. Addictive personality: Addicts tend to be very good at shoveling the BS or conning people into getting what they be. Active addicts often refuse to accept they have a problem so they undergo to hide the truth not only from others but themselves. They are good at the cover-up manipulation and they will often do it with such conviction and emotion. Addictive personalities will also throw out wild accusations and be brutal with others as long as it enables them to get what they want. All these traits back up Beck in being a ’successful’ demagogue. 2. Attention Deficit Disorder: Beck has repeatedly claimed to undergo ADD. I think Beck uses his being ADD to a certain extent to justify his being a demagogue. According to. “adults with ADD / ADHD assay daily with self-regulation: regulating their attention regulating their impulses in talking and challenge and regulating their emotions. {They} have affect staying focused getting organized starting and completing your bring home the bacon managing your time and money and remembering all the little things in daily life. The chaos of living with unrecognized and untreated ADD / ADHD can act its toll: never-ending to-do lists the stress of missed deadlines and forgotten appointments aggravated friends and family members who just don’t understand why you can’t pull it together and self-recrimination over your lack of accomplishments.” This is why it is critical that Beck undergo his meds. Stu and the team to help him be focused. Beck’s involvement in radio. TV and his personal shows further give his over-achieving and his assay with self-regulation. 3. Being Mormon (Latter-day fear) and having a conservative and Republican accent has got to be unbalancing. Many of those calling themselves Republicans  today are anything but that when compared to historical Republican platforms (those Beck grew up with). Then mix in the Mormon religion with the belief in Christ’s Utopian Socialistic teachings but which actively supports and encourages capitalism (the United Order investigate did not work only because the people were ‘not righteous enough’) certainly makes for positions that are difficult to philosophically alter. This must be disquieting to his psyche.  Of cover his religious and political background mix makes it easy to make impassioned pleas for whatever is de jour. Put all the above together with German ancestry a difficult past the belief that without Gods help he would ’screw everything up’ (what Beck said himself) the realization that populate are paying him big bucks to be this way throw some skin over it and there you undergo Glenn Beck. On the flip side of demagoguery is Ron Paul. It could be argued that particularly at the beginning of his race his speeches could use more umph. But you see. Ron Paul speaks from reasoned positions. These positions Ron Paul has held for years vs. Beck being all over the spectrum. Thus Paul is solid and consistent in his convictions and actions while Beck calls himself a libertarian (but isn’t) only because he is philosophically all over the map. Thus it is not surprising a demagogue desire Beck pokes fun of and is ‘discourteous’ of Paul. Paul is the Saint Bernard while Beck is the little Chihuahua envious of Paul’s stature thus wishing to demean it. Additionally. Beck is probably being encouraged by those who pay his bills and listening to his programs. One example of Beck needing to make fun of others is his three stupid questions game on Fridays (I believe.) The only intend is to show how dumb some people can be and laugh at them on national radio. Also the cerebrate he refers to his listeners as ’egest twisted freaks’ is subtle demeaning and the projection of self. One other example showing that Beck is not seeking the truth but rather self aggrandizement and arousal of passions (for ratings thus cater) is his having the NRA (National Rifle Association) on his show to address HR 2640. He subsequently to have the GOA (Gun Owners of America) on the show to express the other side of the story. Beck does not be real discussion he only wishes to inflame emotions and passions to promote himself not the truth. Caveat: no I’m not practicing psychology w/o a license. I just know a nut job when I hear one. This article is copyright © 2007 by Gary Shumway. Permission is hereby granted to create and distribute it electronically and in create other than as part of a schedule and provided that mention of the author’s web site is included. (.) All other rights reserved. Gary Shumway is the compose of and.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.redpills.org/?p=429

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

He is a right-wing blowhard who talks endlessly about stuff he doesn’t have a roll about. A web search on him ordain yield endless idiotic rants where he is precisely wrong ( was claiming that people who hate America — meaning progressives — were getting their houses burnt in California. That do drugs doesn’t even know how conservative San Diego county is let alone understand just how truly offensive such a statement is on its own merits). BECK: We’ll tell you the truth. We’ll tell you the things that are politically incorrect. I’ll go on and I’ll tell you the fires undergo very little to do with global warming if anything. The globe was the hottest in 19 — was it 1934. Stu [executive producer Steve “Stu” Burguiere] or ‘37? — ‘34. 1934 was the hottest year. A stat by the way that was. I believe intentionally distorted by the guy the left holds up as the scientist on global warming. America’s temperature peaked in 1934. Since 1934 the hottest year on record was 1998. It has not gotten warmer since 1998. That’s a fact. Now why are these fires burning out of control? Al Gore and everybody else will have you believe that it is all about global warming. Well really? A one-degree temperature dress that happened at the first move of the century not in the last part of the century at least most of it and a temperature change that hasn’t changed since 1998 is causing superfires in California and only California? Only America? It’s in the American borders. How is that possible? not globally. back up. 1934 was just barely hotter than 1998 the second hottest year on record (again in the US not in the world). The difference is so miniscule that they can be considered to be tied. Third that stat was not intentionally distorted by James Hansen (the scientist he mentions obliquely). There was some recalibration done on the temperatures and the numbers get shuffled around a bit. Not terribly much in fact and the overall conclusions on global warming don’t change. Sixth no real scientist is saying that global warming is causing these fires. What it’s doing is setting up conditions where things like this are more likely. Global warming affects global defy patterns and it’s the Santa Ana winds that turned these fires from a nuisance into a killer. I’m not saying that GW is the trigger here; I’m saying that things will get wonkier from here on out. ascertain on it. Glenn Beck has an astonishing preserve of saying astonishingly stupid things. He said this particular garbage on his radio show. I’m not surprised; AM radio is loaded with talk shows that spew nothing but hate lies distortions and intolerance (I am only intolerant of willful ignorance and willful distortion of reality). But he also has an hour-long schedule on CNN every day! Why the heck does CNN give him any air at all? I don’t like to label people names but Beck is given a national audience and his intellectual capacity is clearly such that he shouldn’t change surface be allowed to rant in public parks to passing squirrels. I’ve had enough of such idiocy especially on matters of what is in fact and in deed life and death. I might be painting a rosy picture of the past but it seems to me that up until a few years ago. CNN was fairly aim headed as far as American news organizations go. Sure they had Crossfire but nobody actually took it seriously. Crossfire was just Jerry Springer for populate who can read. Recently though. CNN has change state almost as bad as Faux News chagrining real news for vacuous speak and mindless would-be commentary. I’m bothered by Glenn Beck but I’m more bothered by Lou Dobbs. Everyone knows that Beck is a blowhard but Dobbs used to have a reputation as a legitimate journalist and if you check his bits on CNN International he comfort comes across as one. On domestic CNN however he’s an isolationist and an alarmist who spouts endlessly in indignant tones about the “immigration crisis,” “the war on the lay categorise” and the “red star rising” without ever stopping to objectively analyze whether any of this is as big a deal as he seems to think it is. I might get sued for writing this. I’m sure that all three of those phrases are copyrighted. Oh and don’t even get me started on Wolf Blitzer. Can that man forbid yelling for thirty seconds. I have the TV on mute and he still woke up my neighbor’s dog. Anyway. CNN can we go approve to getting real. 24 hour news by real journalists please? I mean. Christian Amanpour. Dr. Sanjay Gupta and a couple of others you can keep but Beck. Blitzer. Dobbs and most of the rest really have to go. I’m very skeptical about global warming. It’s not so much that I disagree with the data more that I disagree with the sky is falling mentality out there. I grew up in the 70’s and 80’s and have survived through the Coming Ice Age scare the running out of oil scare the nuclear winter excite etc. I’m glad I survived. I’m still trying to sort out what’s going on and why from a political perspective. I be to think it’s more about obtaining and keeping cater through fear than about saving the world. We tend to vote for the person that ordain contend our dragons for us even if they’re imagined. To act my comments a little related to Phil’s comments here. Glenn Beck’s comments are inappropriate but probably not any more so than some global warming alarmists out there. It would be nice if both sides would change intensity down and let some reasonable people be heard. CNN started its glide to the alter sometime around 2000. At the time I noticed a slight change in news slant and it’s progressed at a steadily increasing rate. It may undergo reached its extreme after the 2004 elections but it’s hard to tell. What I’ve found interesting though is that while the stories had a slight lean to the alter (and sometimes not so slight) the choice of images used made me wonder if those in charge of the CNN website (or maybe graphics department) leaned more to the left. I’d see anti-liberal articles accompanied by decent photos and pro-conservative articles in which the photo of the subject was the beat one to decide (pop-eyed mouth open etc.). Any time I hear conservatives have in mind the “liberal media” it makes me wonder just what planet they’ve been living on for the past decade. I wonder if there were alarmists back in 1938 warning of impending global warming doom. The over the next few years we had a World War cranking out so much factory pollution making tanks planes and bombs…only to see the temperature return to “normal” (whatever that is). I undergo no doubt that all of our pollution is bad for the envirnment. I just don’t buy the end-of-the-world trash pumping out of the media…of course. I hate all media because money/agenda is more important than honesty these days so I might be a bit on the prejudice side there… The Globe is warming up… I think anyone with half a hit can see that. To me the issue is what is causing said warming. I’ve heard arguements from both the “Man-made Global Warming” camp and the “It’s just Earth’s natural cycle and we can’t do anything about it” camp. Either way it.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/10/26/glenn-beck-idiot/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Rosie says deal with MSNBC fell apart (AP via Yahoo! News) It looks as though Rosie O'Donnell won't be facing off with Larry King after all. The acid-tongued talk-show host who famously clashed with Elisabeth Hasselbeck on "The View," announced on her communicate Wednesday that talks to give her a prime-time show on MSNBC had fallen apart. populate IN THE NEWS (The Columbus Dispatch) A view from Rosie could be in the works Rosie O'Donnell is in talks to go to television. The New York Times reports. According to the paper the former View co-host is in discussions with MSNBC. One scenario would put O'Donnell in a prime-time slot potentially going head-to-head with Hannity & Colmes on the Fox News bring and Larry King Live on CNN. She posted on her communicate... Larry – King of the AirwaysLarry King is truly a king. His interview program on CNN is one of the longest running talk shows in history – over 20 years to be claim. This pass I was watching a cut of Fridays’ show where Larry interviewed Jerry Seinfeld. ... FOX News Uses Lurid Chyrons To Help Kathleen Willey Smear The ClintonsNot on Larry King she didn't. As the CNN transcript shows. Tripp simply said. “(Willey is) an honest person. She’s telling the truth.” King did not be to know that Tripp had just contradicted her own Grand Jury testimony. ... Jay Leno Rumored To regenerate Larry King On CNNJay Leno Rumored To Replace Larry King On CNN Tom Dorsey reports: "Jay Leno who announced three years ago that he would step aside in 2009 to let Conan O'Brien take over the 'Tonight Show' host head may be having second thoughts. ... alfranken jpg On Wednesday night as the Imus controversy swirled. Al Franken asked Larry King why Glenn Beck was still on CNN after he asked newly elected Rep. Ellison if he was working for the enemy. I've asked the same question myself. One that CNN has never answered….04/11/07 video_wmv transfer (7704) | Play (8706) video_mov transfer (3073) | Play (6012) Transcript via CNN FRANKEN: You know it's — it's their choice. I evaluate — I evaluate NBC made the alter decision. I evaluate cable news is telecommunicate news. And he has that position. I undergo heard a lot of talk radio — now. I will furnish you an example. CNN has Glenn Beck on. Glenn Beck asked my congressman. Keith Ellison who is the first Muslim to be elected to Congress you know. I just want to ask you how do I experience that you're not working with the enemy? And he said that — I think he said it on CNN. But he certainly is — he's on CNN. I don't experience why that wasn't grounds for CNN thinking well maybe Glenn Beck shouldn't be on. I mean how dare he say that to a congressman who has just been elected? And I hear this kind of thing a lot of measure. I monitored a lot of right-wing radio when I was doing my show and before it. And I've heard go Limbaugh say things that are worse than this. (full transcript below the fold) And so. I don't know. KING: Does that alter thing then forgivable since others are doing it? You experience if you go. 40. 50 miles an hour it's not an excuse if other people do it and they forbid you. But should he be at least given some capture? FRANKEN: I don't know if I buy the analogy but I'm not glad I'm making this decision. This is up to CBS' management. Let's put it that way. KING: You wouldn't want to be in the position to undergo to make it? FRANKEN: Well if I were. I would alter it but that's not my decision thank you. That's the say. KING: With a lot of it going on are you calling for other dismissals? FRANKEN: No. I'm not. Just Glenn Beck on your communicate. KING: Just Glenn Beck. KING: He's on "HEADLINE NEWS," right? FRANKEN: Well. "advertise NEWS" is move of CNN. And… KING: Have you been on the Imus show? FRANKEN: I undergo. I undergo been on a couple of times over the years. And you experience after he did the color accommodate — or no it wasn't White accommodate correspondent — it was the Radio and TV Correspondents Dinner. KING: Yes. FRANKEN: I criticized him then so we were on the outs. And you experience one of the worst parts about this. I evaluate is that he used the defense it was a joke. Now. Larry. I experience that you loved Lenny Bruce. And Lenny Bruce offended populate all the time. But there was always an actual point behind it right? KING: change by reversal. Correct. FRANKEN: There was a joke. The joke meant something. It was about societal hypocrisy. Whatever it was about. This was — I don't get this communicate. And I don't get the idea of having — you k now as someone who has had a radio show of having a kind of racist sidekick. Which I guess is what it is. I don't listen to Imus enough. But isn't it — was that the concept of a show. I'm going to undergo a vaguely racist sidekick? KING: I don't evaluate that's the concept of the show. It covers everything. FRANKEN: OK. KING: It has major political figures as you experience. FRANKEN: Yes. I experience. I know and that's — he's choose of trying to be a shock jock and be Tim Russert. And that's a needle you have to go and I evaluate it's threadable. And I anticipate he just didn't do it.

Monday evening he had a program about the Perfect Day on CNN Headline News that revealed some of the same information about threats to our schools and school busses by possible Jihadists that I undergo chronicled here in on this blog. Today he chatted with Terrorism analyst and compose Brad Thor about the bedevil pieces that are out there in news snippets police blotters and reports that may furnish us a clue of what the Jihadists might pull on us next. GLENN: This is really coming from hard evidence that our Government really does not want us to know per se. I mean they’ve been alerting populate but they’re been doing cryptically because they don’t be widespread panic. THOR: …Osama Bin Laden is a real student of history. And he said there is a historic precedent for The ameliorate Day…yes the dots are out there. Every time we be there’s something else and they are connected and that’s something we be to be very conscious of. …what we’re seeing across the country with the two Saudi Arabian men. I talked to populate in that investigation drink in Florida in the Tampa area the two Saudi men that boarded that school bus and wouldn’t get off and all that kind of stuff where there was a strong feeling among populate involved in that investigation that that was a dry run. We see this we see school buses missing. 17 in Texas. We see thousands of school bus radios missing in the Northwest the Pacific Northwest. We find in the course of this investigation. I talked with — it would breathe out your mind how many law enforcement departments I talked to that undergo interrupted active surveillance on schools across the country. The dots are there. GLENN: ….. In Iraq we found a diskette that had a — that had downloaded all of the Department of Education security measures and they’re all available online. GLENN: …So the diskette has basically our emergency procedures in our schools and what the Department of Education says you’ve got to be create from raw material for and this is what you do in case. So there’s another sign that they’re studying us. THOR: …[at] an Al-Qaeda affiliated safehouse over in Iraq they were school blueprints basically surprise plans for schools across the country. San Diego. California. West Salem. Oregon. Boyertown. Pennsylvania schools in Texas. Virginia. New Jersey and this was very very disconcerting…They are working so hard to prevent this from happening… they do not be this to come about. They are working hard but at the same measure they are trying to prevent people from panicking. GLENN: …They just have it — it’s exactly desire September 11th. What did you know and when did you know it. Well we knew that they were trying to do pilots but who would undergo thought that they were going to do it into the World change Center? We didn’t know that piece. We’re in exactly the same situation. GLENN: … a lot of these schools are in the heartland they’re in small communities and they think oh well nothing ordain come about here. You are the bigger target than New York City on this particular case alter? THOR: Exactly. In one of the things that we’re seeing here is that they are looking for the softest targets possible and that means when you’re looking at schools in the heartland you be at how desire it takes from a 911 phone label to getting a tactical team not just patrol officers but a tactical team on site and in a lot of places that takes a long measure especially if you undergo a multijurisdictional swat aggroup. So what these terrorists are looking for from the stuff that’s been recovered…. Bin Laden has said what we did in Russia we will visit 100 times worse in America. He’s change surface gotten a religious edict allowing him to blackball up to two million American children and what they are looking for is a educate where the girls are old enough to rape and the boys are too small to contend back. GLENN:…There’s eight hours of attach that we found in Pakistan in another Al-Qaeda training camp eight hours of tape where they made a mock American school. The guy the terrorists came in and they took mock American students they took one little boy and they shot him in the head immediately and then in English said. “Now follow our directions exactly.” It’s how to take over an American educate. THOR: It’s kind of the master planning tapes of Al-Qaeda. It is the beat library as best as our intelligence and military people know and what they did was they edited down to a one-hour version to show American law enforcement in particular what they be to be prepared for and the most chilling thing,…. has been the attack on the educate where they undergo the do by role players. They’ve change surface got — you can comprehend in the accent there’s almost like a soundtrack of children crying to add realism to the training of these Al-Qaeda.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/puzzle-pieces-for-a-potential-mass-slaughter-at-our-schools/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

A few years ago I got a call from the Glenn Beck radio show asking me some questions on immigration. I was happy to help the segment producer as I am with most people in the news media. But then the producer asked if I could find a client or two for them to interview for the conjoin. I would always beg on contacting the client first before giving out his or her name. However in this inspect I was unfamiliar with the radio show's host and decided to first do some investigate before change surface agreeing to try and contact a client. When I started to do the research I quickly realized that Glenn Beck had about 100 articles on immigration in his newsletters archived at his web site. And they were without exception unfavorable to immigrants. So it was obvious to me what the political bent was. When Glenn Beck was given a prominent on air role at CNN's advertise News. I groaned knowing that another Lou Dobbs-type was being given a prominent role at CNN. So the fact that Beck is now pushing an anti-immigration agenda in his interviews should surprise no one. That's why I anticipate to inform the public that he actually has had a good pro-immigration record is a bit of a affect. One of the key exchanges is where he reminds Beck the illegal immigration is NOT a crime. Beck's talk radio host background shows as he insists on his being change by reversal on a misstatement change surface if he has no roll. Guiliani handles himself well as can be seen in this transfer. GIULIANI: The context of that was for people to come forward to report crimes because we needed their help and we didn't want them to be afraid of coming forward. The context of that was we wanted them to put their children in educate not to be afraid to do that. Even with the policy that I pointed. I continued it was probably seven eight years old there were still populate illegal immigrants who would not report crimes. But we wanted them to. GLENN: Right. But isn't illegal immigration a crime in and of itself? GIULIANI: No. GLENN: Aren't you saying -- GIULIANI: Glenn -- GLENN: You're protecting criminals by saying that being treated as a criminal is unfair. GIULIANI: Glenn it's not a crime. I experience that's very hard for people to understand but it's not a federal crime. GLENN: It's a misdemeanor but if you've been nailed it is a crime. If you've been nailed displace approve and come back it is a crime. GIULIANI: Glenn being an illegal immigrant the 400,000 were not prosecuted for crimes by the federal government nor could they be. I was U. S attorney in the southern district of New York. So believe me. I experience this. In fact when you impel an immigrant out of the country it's not a criminal proceeding. It's a civil proceeding. GLENN: Is it -- GIULIANI: One of the things that congress wanted to do a year ago is to alter it a crime which indicates that it isn't. GLENN: Should it be? GIULIANI: Should it be? No it shouldn't be because the government wouldn't be able to prosecute it. We couldn't prosecute 12 million people. We undergo only 2 million populate in jail right now for all the crimes that are committed in the country. 2.5 million. If you were to make it a crime you would have to take the resources of the criminal justice system and increase it by about 6. In other words you'd have to take all the 800,000 guard and who knows how many police we would have to have. In re Rudy's "go" to reasonableness. I evaluate it is more the reportage than what most of these folks are actually saying. When I watched some fo the GOP debates I couldn't accept what was reported. I obsess about Iraq qua Iraq and Iraq qua the Global War on Terror and I too though command Petraeus had said he could nto say if Iraq improved US security. Technically he did but shortly therafter he expanded on the affect and said our involvment in Iraq did in fact iprove our security but that he hadn't really thought about that first question until advance questioning (it being above his pay evaluate and all) and so he initially said he "couldn't say". A similar phenomenon goes on with those supposedly championing "amnesty" versus those who "hate immigrants". Beck may not be the world's most flame-throwing example but he and op-ed writers and the book folks at groups like MoveOn. Org are intentionally picking apart current events like lawyers' briefs out of contenxt and dishonestly at times and I think it has affected news coverage. And let us face it many reporters envy the opinionators. See for example Ali there are bad apples in all ethnic groups by your calculations the 600,000 people you claim to be criminal means.05% of that group clearly not the majority. You are stereotyping populate for a few bad apples most of these people come here to work and provide abetter life for their families like any other immigrants now and forever in this country. People that get caught and are out of status and get deported do not go in the category of criminals. Illegal Immigrant does not equal criminal you undergo to be very narrow minded.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2007/09/guilianis-reaso.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

It took a Republican from the Tampa Bay area to finally say it: “Sanctuary cities are an bruise to law-abiding citizens.” The Brooksvill Republican. Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite will introduce a account this week that would yank certain federal funding from states and localities with policies that ban cooperation with federal officials in apprehending or removing undocumented immigrants from the country. The federal funds lost would be funding that helps pay for jailing illegal immigrants that commit crimes. Under Brown-Waite’s account a express or municipality could be targeted if it has in displace “a statute policy or practice” that prevents law enforcement from cooperating with federal officials regarding illegal immigrants apprehended “in the cover of routine duties.” Funding revocation would mouth if those policies continue six months after Brown-Waite’s bill became law. GOP presidential candidate whom Brown-Waite supports for the White accommodate proposed such a plan measure month. Romney described as having an “open door policy that said. ‘Come on in we want you if you’re undocumented and this will be a zone of protection. You don’t have to worry about city officials providing information to the federal government.’” Giuliani had defended his policy of effectively governing a “sanctuary city” by saying approve then in Clear Lake. “Frankly that designation would not apply to New York City. What you got to be at in fairness to is the overall results — and no city in terms of crime safety dealing with illegality of all different kinds has done a exceed job than New York City.” But Romney responded: “He instructed city workers not to provide information to the federal government that would accept them to compel the law. “I be to alter sure that those cities that are sending a different message that they also are hearing from us that their communicate is not accepted,” said Romney said a month ago in Iowa. “There are some cities that go out and say ‘We are sanctuary cities we won’t enforce immigration laws.’ We’ve got to cut back on the payments we taxpayers alter to those cities to let them experience that is not the say A draft of Brown-Waite’s legislation notes that $1 billion would be authorized by Congress annually for an existing Department of Justice program to reimburse states and localities for a administer of their costs of incarcerating illegal immigrants on state or local criminal charges and convictions. For those that feel that victims of crime should be able to escape scrutiny for the purported cerebrate of ensuring cooperation to punish offenders the account say that local law enforcement agencies do not undergo to inform the identity of a victim of a crime or a witness to a crime for the purpose of immigration enforcement or removal. Brown-Waite’s bill is similar to an amendment to a spending account passed by the accommodate this year. GOP presidential candidate Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo sponsored a account that would block Homeland Security funding in 2008 to localities that prevent cooperation between local police and federal immigration authorities. New Haven’s policy is a written order that states that in “any contact with individuals in which warrant checks are performed,” an Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirm that does not involve criminal charges “should be ignored.” But some localities don’t undergo official orders that say they are refusing to help federal authorities curb illegal immigration by not reporting illegal aliens to ICE. “Obviously there is no way of tracking it drink if a particular guard chief of sheriff just gives a verbal request,” Brown-Waite said. An August 2006 Congressional investigate Service inform listed thirty-one cities and counties nationwide as having sanctuary policies Los Angeles. San Diego. Detroit. Minneapolis. Baltimore. New York. San Francisco. Austin. Texas and Cambridge. crowd. were identified in the Congressional Research function report. At a U. S. House Committee on Homeland Security hearing measure week. Chertoff said. “People use the term ’sanctuary city’ in different ways,” Chertoff responded. “So I am never quite sure what they mean.” Chertoff also said: “I don’t experience that I undergo the authority to cut off all Homeland Security funds if I be with the city’s policy on immigration.” Unsatisfied with his comments she wrote a follow-up letter asking him to let her experience what options if any his department has to take action against sanctuary cities. If there are no legal options available she wrote that she wants Chertoff to give recommendations for what added authority he needs “to enforce the law and demand such cities to uphold established immigration laws and regulations.” This month the battle between Romney and heated up again at the with Romney charging.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://777denny.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/house-bill-to-deny-some-fed-funds-to-sanctuary-cities/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam