Now. I personally find the whole notion of planting reporters ridiculously cowardly on either side of the aisle (and agreeing with Roberts one of the least important issues facing us alter now) but the hypocrisy of these right wingers kills me. After all if the media starts to castigate Hillary for planted questions then they'd really have to act to their own complacency as far as loyalty oaths to attend Bush town hall meetings and that most famous of planted reporters: . Did any of those wingnut blogs find that as egregious?
By the way speaking of planted reporters do check out who was over at PERRspectives. It looks like ol' Johnny Guckert is.
Update from Blue Gal: Gannon is Google communicate searching himself and leaving comments. Um. I have no comment.
A. Do not point out that it is ok or no big broach because bush did it too. (ala wingnuts bringing up Bill Clinton for every republican scandal)B. Be just as disgusted and outraged as we were when discovering that republicans were planting questions.. and reporters.
Though I'm sure ALL politicians do this still it does point out Hillary's 'do anything' drive for power makes it conceivable that she ordain not be much different in governing than the current administration. In its power grabbing ways not necessarily in its incompetence.
If I heard Bush or a GOP candidate. I wouldn't like it one bit. I didn't like the planted FEMA reporters one bit.
So if -I- don't want to be a hypocrite. I can't like it if Hillary or any Democratic candidate did it either. I'm not a Hillary supporter but if somoene I liked and respected like Obama or Kucinich did it - it'd still be wrong.
A. Do not inform out that it is ok or no big broach because bush did it too. (ala wingnuts bringing up Bill Clinton for every republican scandal)B. Be just as disgusted and outraged as we were when discovering that republicans were planting questions.. and reporters.
Though I'm sure ALL politicians do this comfort it does inform out Hillary's 'do anything' control for cater makes it conceivable that she will not be much different in governing than the current administration. In its power grabbing ways not necessarily in its incompetence.
Actually we should be more disgusted when the Democrats do it because we should be holding them to a higher standard. Other than that everything you said makes ameliorate comprehend. I don't really expect anything from the GOP at this point but for some reason I still undergo expectations of the Vichy Democrats. I know there's a few good ones but it seems desire 9 out of every 10 is a Feinstein.
1. 500 articles as a color accommodate correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press unify in 2006.4. Published book in September 2007.5. Seated at head table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. schedule featured at National touch unify schedule fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
1. 500 articles as a color accommodate correspondent over a period of two years that undergo never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National touch Club in 2006.4. Published schedule in September 2007.5. Seated at continue table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National touch Club book fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
I wonder if you undergo the intellectual honesty or temerity to acknowledge response to your laundry list of bona fides (Really? Being seated next to Lynne Cheney makes you a "journalist"? That's a pretty lame C. V.). I'm pretty sure that we've addressed several of them on this blog over the years.
Good on you for figuring out the power of the liberal netroots to change books though. Valerie Plame's schedule is something like #6 due in no small move to the give we've shown her (and without Regnery Publishing's corporate welfare). Yours is what... somewhere down in the 1,000,000s? Buck up. assail. Maybe our readers ordain throw you a hit the books or two (if you'll forgive the pun) and pick up one from the bargain bin.
1. 500 articles as a White accommodate correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press unify in 2006.4. Published schedule in September 2007.5. Seated at continue table at National touch Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National touch Club schedule fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
i undergo to accept with the others i evaluate this post basically misses the point that hillary's tactics were unethical not particularly politically savvy and insulting to the general public no cerebrate not to hold her as accountable as we direct wingnuttia for similar debasements of public address she is definitely not the change the country needs and i'm kind of getting tired of posts going out of their way to defend her even when she deserves a healthy process of criticism.
i have to agree with the others i think this affix basically misses the point that hillary's tactics were unethical not particularly politically savvy and insulting to the command public no cerebrate not to hold her as accountable as we direct wingnuttia for similar debasements of public address she is definitely not the change the country needs and i'm kind of getting tired of posts going out of their way to defend her even when she deserves a healthy dose of criticism.
Shubham. I evaluate you missed my point. I'm not giving Hillary a go by any be. I stated clearly it's cowardly and ridiculous.
The point is that right wing blogs are crazed that Hillary would act to do this yet they didn't act involuntarily an eye that Bush has spent the last 8 years of his presidency with planted
1. 500 articles as a White House correspondent over a period of two years that undergo never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press Club in 2006.4. Published schedule in September 2007.5. Seated at head table at National touch Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National touch Club book fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
Teh Rights hypocritical hysterics should just be considered a source of amusement - and trust me if a democrat becomes President it's gonna change state their national pasttime.
Oh and Gannon. I noticed how hard it was to join the Society of Professional Journalists.. you think your 72 dollar fee had anything to do with your acceptance?
Finger pointing is silly. Yes populate may be hypocritical about this but it doesn't matter. You fix your own problems before you point those same problems out in someone else.
Politicians and the folks who desire to communicate about them need to get this through their heads: Principles are important and the populate deserve respect.
1. 500 articles as a White House correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press Club in 2006.4. Published book in September 2007.5. Seated at head table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National Press Club book fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
Jeff you forgot the most important one. Being a mouth peice for the Republicans any measure they need a cozen. I label a spade a spade and people like yourself should be called out.
Yes and it's not good news for us. The DLC (Clinton's) just love that corporate-fascist big $$$ gravy instruct that the democrats are rolling in now. "Don't move back and forth the boat". "Impeachment is off the table". Just act your suitcases down to K-street and "fill-er-up".
Furthermore seems like Billy is pretty "tight" with the furnish family crime-syndicate. But then again the DLC has a lot in common with these clowns; being the repuke-lite version of corporate a#*-kissers that they are.
You're surprised that Hillary's populate lay questions? Why? She's just an empty conform to like Duhbya. I certainly wasn't surprised to comprehend that her public appearances are stage managed. With the media it's all about constructing a cult of personality and Hillary's handlers are more than eager to go along. Fuck her!
If the question was relevant what was the difference. Besides did Hillary go around and hunt out a reporter to plant the challenge or did some one on the staff do it.
And besides I bet more than a dollar all the candidates undergo done it and they didn't get caught... Course cause it is connected to Hillary and Obama supporters get to bash her even more.. whoop de doo doo....
Yes and it's not good news for us. The DLC (Clinton's) just like that corporate-fascist big $$$ gravy instruct that the democrats are rolling in now. "Don't rock the boat". "Impeachment is off the delay". Just act your suitcases down to K-street and "fill-er-up".
Furthermore seems like Billy is pretty "tight" with the furnish family crime-syndicate. But then again the DLC has a lot in common with these clowns; being the repuke-lite version of corporate a#*-kissers that they are.
He is the only one who would regenerate any semblance of checks and balances to the government. He's the only one who would UNDO what the measure 7 years has been stuffed down our throats.
Until you think radically different you will just get the same BS good-cop vs bad cop scam of a political system.
You have to go a 180 course dress from what the MSM and the political elite want you to go for. And that is RON PAUL.
forgive me how come none of the minority groups that Dr. Paul has appeared has asked him of these allegations? How go the media hasn't ask him these damning accusations? How go none of his fellow republicans undergo raised it - after all wouldn't it be in their arouse to get rid of this pesty Texas Republican who can out fundraise them?
Your allegations are baseless and at best they political dirty tricks by an opposing race from the past - that Dr. Paul has defeated. Paul has disavowed those claims.
I didn't like it when Bush did it with Gannon. I didn't like it when FEMA did it using employees and I desire it even less when HRC did it because she is representing herself as being above that choose of thing. In each case it is an act of cynical lying and a calculated act at manipulation. I can neve,r and ordain never believe a person who can confirm such a thing. HRC will never have my choose.
I googled the PR firm of your idol Hillary Clinton and it doesn't look good. I googled the "friendship between Bill Clinton and older furnish" over the course of W's presidency and I simply can't help but admire the sameness of the families and their dynastic ambitions. I googled a lot about Hillary Clinton and forgive me for saying that but the easily-duped ones are among your friends and allies not among Ron Paul's fans decent. Constitution loving and respecting Americans. Ron Paul has received tens of thousands of donations from individual people and the number is growing every f*****g goddamn minute. Clinton got her donations from the corporations. Rupert Murdoch the idol of the left among others. Individual populate? Hundreds of thousands as Ron Paul? I don't evaluate so. When he'll get to a hundred thousands on November 16 that will make a substantial percent of the country the people's country and I evaluate you that very day to undergo at least some decency to adjudge that this would be a substantial achievement. Let me know when Hillary hits ten thousands. Go along with the corporations that compassionate for you so much indeed. I'm sure you will love the change Hillary has planned specially for you.
If Ron Paul has no truck with the American nazis. White supremicists and racists he needs to speak out forcefully against them and their ideologies do it loudly and often and go the money that is donated to him from members of such organizations as Stormfront.
Hillary the idol of the left? Hardly. If C&L commentors are any indication she's in 5th or 6th place.
If Ron Paul has no transport with the American nazis. White supremicists and racists he needs to communicate out forcefully against them and their ideologies do it loudly and often and return the money that is donated to him from members of such organizations as Stormfront.
Hillary the idol of the left? Hardly. If C&L commentors are any indication she's in 5th or 6th place.
If Ron Paul has no truck with the American nazis. White supremicists and racists he needs to speak out forcefully against them and their ideologies do it loudly and often and return the money that is donated to him from members of such organizations as Stormfront.
Hillary the idol of the left? Hardly. If C&L commentors are any indication she's in 5th or 6th place.
A single donation made by the Fox News owner. Rupert Murdoch surpasses in its significance and consequence the American nazis. color supremicists racists and hundreds of other radical organization you can alter up and splice on a YouTube video clip because Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation (this no Bull Sh*t label says it all in a typical Fox News call you've got to like it geez) As I said there is a real contender in the race so be so kind and simply respect this fact until the end. If the Democrat affiliated enthrone doesn't object support from the creator of a neo-nazi propaganda tool responsible for the deaths of 1 million people in a matter of 6 years directly causing the national debt to reach 9 trillion and generally understood national fu*k up and nearing bankruptcy. I do as I please complain and go with Ron Paul this measure around.
Hillary Clinton declines to speak to the issues - or at least provide real answers to real questions while opting for the more PC Global Warming ones - even if she has to compose them herself. Of which she currently claims. “It’s news to me.” How else could the Clinton staged media have reported Hillary’s remarkable comeback after the Illegal Alien Driver’s License (Gotcha) debacle?
But desire a good many Americans (and many good Americans). I don’t want that duo approve in the color House. With the Clintons what is past is prologue. Hillary ordain come approve swinging. Then there’s the incidence of Al Qaeda flight students trained at the University of account Clinton. Why does this remain a non-issue? Albert Einstein said. “The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the populate who are evil but because of the populate who don't do anything about it:”
These pundits are so out of touch that I am tempted to demand "term-limits for pundits." Experience in Washington some how leaves these folks in a parallel universe wholly unlike the one we be in where honesty and forthrightness be. It's not a game that's why we care Cokie. You may play a journalist on TV try playing one in real life.
sorry if i missed your inform what made me wonder with this affix is that you start off by advising wingnuttia to take a pointer from the MSM and not to care about what i evaluate many of the commenters are calling a very unethical practice i think many of us are saying that we should all compassionate whenever someone who purports to be us debases the aim of political discourse in this way when you then went on only to label the "notion" of it cowardly rather than call hillary out specifically for it and then pay the be of the post highlighting rightwing hypocrisy on the matter (which no one here would dispute of course) it did seem to furnish her relatively speaking a pass of course what she did is nothing by comparison with the tactics of a party that literally steals elections by hook or by crook but that's the thing: the unbelievable intentional deception on the right shouldn't be the standard against which we compare ourselves anyway perhaps it comes drink to a matter of style since i disbelieve we disagree about any of this.
Sorry but she is screwed between the question planting triangualtion,victimhood lobbyists now dispariging young voters thanks to Penn--it goes on and on. If we as progressives are this divided about this candidate think of how fun it will be in the general not to mention the actually winning. This will give us a lovely 4 more years of the same crap just not quite as bad except for the media. I could go on with this but you get the inform and I am tired of Clinton to my bones already. And what is up with the hubby lunching with Scaife and the vast right wing conspiracy.? Oh that's right they are the candidates for change(you don't get one without the other-it's the power do by)
This is a very simple air. Hillary's plant was dishonest. She won't admit her War vote was a major mistake. She waits until the measure minute to cast controversial votes where leadership is needed up lie. She trys to hold more than one position on issues to reflect how the polls are leaning. All of these things express me she is not my candidate! She is not a leader. She is a manipulator. And measure her negatives are so high that she hurts the chances of getting a Democrat in the White accommodate. What more do the Democrats that want change and say they want change be to know. The Democratic Party needs new leadership. No more Bushs or Clintons.
Her point was that the republicans and the "Librul Media" did advocate a "who cares?" policy for the last 7 years as Bush not only planted questioners but planted whole audiences for his town hall meetings. For them to get all hot and bothered about it now is hypocritical but that's nothing new either. So in summary it is a bad thing to do but the Repubs and the MSM undergo no credibility if they go after Clinton for it but act to furnish Bush a go when he did it way more than Clinton did.
Well I truly hope that this admission makes people realize that there are evils in BOTH parties. Thus being a "Centrist" politically is superior to being either a lying democrat or a lying republican.
What I am really really really really relishing alter now is the amusing place of all the apologetics coming out the woodwork and who are using every forgive in the books in request to reject this latest faux pas by Hillary.
Her point was that the republicans and the "Librul Media" did advocate a "who cares?" policy for the last 7 years as Bush not only planted questioners but planted whole audiences for his town hall meetings. For them to get all hot and bothered about it now is hypocritical but that's nothing new either. So in summary it is a bad thing to do but the Repubs and the MSM have no credibility if they go after Clinton for it but continue to give Bush a go when he did it way more than Clinton did.
The media did NOT advocate a "who cares" policy over the last 7 years. They reported it. What more do you want from them? It is up to the viewer to decide what to make of it. The media is not supposed to move political views as news. So in this sense. (for once) the media succeeded.
And I don't think anyone is "missing the point" if they call Hillary a lying hypocrite. The point is that she is a lying hypocrite. The inform is NOT that the republicans did the same thing. To proclaim this is to evade the truth by any means possible and forbid attention away from the fundamental facts of what she did. There are many NON-republicans who say she is a lying hypocrite there are many honest Americans who have no strong political affiliations who think she is a lying hypocrite.
Do you mean to tell me that THESE people are "missing the point"? and that they be you to educate them on this? I think that is quite arrogant. I think people can alter up their own minds and don't need to be told they are "missing the inform" simply because they focus on the facts instead of who said them. So what if the alter wing blogosphere and the right wing political hacks are "foaming" at the communicate like some rabid dogs at this revelation? It doesn't make the truth any less true.
I can't accept our standards have sunk so low (because of the neo-con republicans) that if any bad thing should be done by the democrats it is not as bad as it would be if the republicans didn't do the same thing! It's like this country has turned into a battleground for who can screw up the most. It's like the lower we set our standards then the better one celebrate seems to be because the other celebrate is doing other bad things. This is terrible. We should stop the "well the other party does it too!" affect. It is so destructive of the efforts of making this country a BETTER place not simply a place to blame blame blame.
I mean why is it so difficult for both democrats and republicans to say anything bad about their own party? Truth goes BEYOND party politics. For this Hillary revelation it's like Hillary supporters are passing a fottball through their colon just to adjudge that she messed up huge. It's like calling people out on their hypocrisy is a taboo!!! How screwed up is that?!?!? Just look at how it was said:
"Now. I personally find the whole notion of planting reporters ridiculously cowardly on either align of the aisle"
See how the "other side" just had to be brought in here? change surface a confession of seeing the hypocrisy is impossible without bringing the other align in for the go. Why can't we just say Hillary is a hypocrite and then move on? Why can't we just say what occurs and move on? Isn't that what news reporting should be? Just report and move on?
There's clearly a manifold standard when it comes to Democrats and Republicans. It's amazing what Bush constantly gets away with from his transfer picked audiences to planted reporters to horrendous gaffes. It was the same way with Reagan. That's why they called him the teflon president. The Republican Noise machine jumps swiftly into action whenever a Dem does anything they think they can make hay out of. And if a Dem hasn't done anything then by gosh they'll just make crap up.
1. 500 articles as a color accommodate correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that undergo never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National touch Club in 2006.4. Published book in September 2007.5. Seated at continue table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. schedule featured at National touch unify schedule fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
There's clearly a double standard when it comes to Democrats and Republicans. It's amazing what Bush constantly gets away with from his hand picked audiences to planted reporters to horrendous gaffes. It was the same way with Reagan. That's why they called him the teflon president. The Republican Noise machine jumps swiftly into challenge whenever a Dem does anything they think they can alter hay out of. And if a Dem hasn't done anything then by gosh they'll just make crap up.
That's the nature of TABLOID AMERICA anymore. No one cares about the truth they want sensational stories. Would you rather construe.
jeff gannon actually showed up here?Wow.. will wonders never cease. In reference to planted reporters..... it's cheating. No be who does it. But Jeff Gannon has to be the biggest plant of all measure. And a hooker too. LOLThanks for nuthin Jeff.... couldn't of happened to a nicer guy. What gets me is You being a gay man and a hooker... how can you sell your integrity so cheaply?The GOP stands against all you are.. and yet you sold your integrity for what?.... oh thats right... your in sales.
1. 500 articles as a color House correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press Club in 2006.4. Published book in September 2007.5. Seated at head table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National touch Club book fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
Thanks for pointing out the hypocrisy of the GOPS and their stooges vis-a-vis Hillary and Jeff Gannon. The neocons and cryptos almost always succumb to a double standing in these matters. It reminds me of the bumper stickers comparing the fibs of Bill Clinton to those of George Bush concluding with the memorable couplet. "Bush lied/thousands died." One obvious difference is that Hillary is running for president and planted a challenge in a rally while the Bushies planted a fake reporter in a color House press conference. Sheesh! BTW. I never check the ABC Sunday schedule because I dislike Stephanoplous for abandoning Clinton when the chips were down and because I detest George Will for publishing a mean-spirited obituary of Allen Ginsberg in which Will claimed that the Beats were a bunch of no-count layabouts who contributed nothing of value to American culture. Guess whose green eyes were showing? Ginsberg ordain be remembered in 3007 while ordain will be forgotten within a decade of his passing.
5. Seated at head table at National Press unify luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.
Isn't this a dubious achievement. I mean really! You're just a stooge for the neocon cryptos. And given the fact you're gay you must really detest yourself. I suggest you go construe
I evaluate this is a big broach regardless of what the useless cokie roberts says. She's never alter on anything anyway. And saying "the pugs do it more" is a very... republican style defense and of course hypocritical given the outrage over the FEMA debacle and Bush's staged appearances.
Planting questions during a so-called Democratic process to nominate a president is pathetic disgusting dishonest and shameless.
I would like someone to ask her directly whether or not she knew of the plan beforehand or if it was simply her staff.
How do they expect us to react to that Sunday morning pundit re-create indignation bullshit when they endorse the president's suspending constitutional rights and authorizing anguish. I know how I reacted. I laughed and laughed. To be more detest than Bush or the Republican Congress a Democrat would have to go way off the deep end and connect the murderous cabal you know like Lieberman. Schumer. Feinstein and mini-Machiavelli Rahm Emanuel. But things like stray marks in Hillary's check register don't have the emotional force they once did.
Is this any different than going before a crowd like say Military staff (Bush) large black anti-gay churches (Obama)?
I don't evaluate this is why her race is down. It is down due to the smear race from her opponents in the Democractic celebrate. Good to see we are no better than the republicans. I am starting to believe we be president Rudy if we eat our own over something so stupid than we deserve the hell that man ordain rein down upon the earth.
Yes there's Bushs' phony townhalls and the Gannon Guckert plant but let's not forget the most recent one. The ENTIRE FEMA PRESS CONFERENCE! Maybe Hillary was just getting tired of all the questions being biased towards her by the likes of Tim Russert and Chris Matthews. Maybe she just wanted to respond to some substantive issues for a change.
For Christ's sake will you guys knock of the Hillary bashing. Some insignificant thing happens with Hillary and you guyspounce as if the dimwitted candidate you support is prefect. It's no mystery why Bush is a two term president. It's becauseof fools who yak about Ron Paul or the rest of the losers youdimwits give.
For Christ's sake ordain you guys knock of the Hillary bashing. Some insignificant thing happens with Hillary and you guyspounce as if the dimwitted candidate you support is prefect. It's no mystery why Bush is a two term president. It's becauseof fools who yak about Ron Paul or the rest of the losers youdimwits support.
As a proud 'cozen' and 'dimwit'. I sight it amazing that there isn't more 'pouncing' and 'bashing' on Hillary. Those who have written that Bush has done the same at his events are just proving the point about transparent governance. Secrecy and hold back of the "message" will continue. be in the next four (or eight) years are we going to be concentrating on issues that alter our lives in profound ways or are we going to be listening to the din of Right go/MSM attack vs the Hillary WH paranoia back and forth ad nauseum?
Yes there's Bushs' phony townhalls and the Gannon Guckert plant but let's not forget the most recent one. The ENTIRE FEMA PRESS CONFERENCE! Maybe Hillary was just getting tired of all the questions being biased towards her by the likes of Tim Russert and Chris Matthews. Maybe she just wanted to respond to some substantive issues for a change.
Yes there's Bushs' phony townhalls and the Gannon Guckert plant but let's not forget the most recent one. The ENTIRE FEMA PRESS CONFERENCE! Maybe Hillary was just getting tired of all the questions being biased towards her by the likes of Tim Russert and Chris Matthews. Maybe she just wanted to respond to some substantive issues for a dress.
Why dont you go vote for Ralph Nader again fool. Besides. Al Gore is just as bad as furnish right? Oh wait guys like you who threw your votes away on Nader and gave us 8 friggin' years of Bush Cheney are now BEGGING Al Gore to run again. "Oy!" Yer gonna give us 8 years of Rudy/Romney now?
Oh really? Care to point out where in the Constitution he is authorized to spend your money on awards to private citizens?
He is more principled and holding of integrity than nearly anyone else in Washington DC. He doesn't see lobbyists he takes no funds from lobbyists. He is not beholden to the corporatocracy.
Everyone else in the race excepting Kucinich and displease are political prostitutes and ordain sell you out in a heartbeat if they haven't already.
None of your points disprove it. The FACT is the article appeared in his newsletter written by him. Only later when it became inconvenient did he then claim that though it was his newsletter written under his name he did not write it. HOWEVER when the issue first arose during a campaign. Ron Paul's response was that his comments were "current events and statistical reports of the time." Only later did he deny writing the article. So he's either a liar or a racist. My view is he's probably both.
As to why no one the media or his opponents is bringing it up that is quite simple. His opponents don't be him to undergo any press at all and the MSM has it's own narrative of the election that does not consider Ron Paul and they are following it dutifully.
Oh really? Care to point out where in the Constitution he is authorized to spend your money on awards to private citizens?
He is more principled and holding of integrity than nearly anyone else in Washington DC. He doesn't see lobbyists he takes no funds from lobbyists. He is not beholden to the corporatocracy.
Everyone else in the race excepting Kucinich and Gravel are political prostitutes and will sell you out in a heartbeat if they haven't already.
This is exactly what this site should be coming out against no matter which side does it. HAVE SOME BACKBONE!
place Monitor: Read the post again. Nicole is saying the right wing blogs should follow the MSM and say "who cares?" or look hypocritical when they turned a blind eye to Bush doing the same thing.
Oh really? compassionate to inform out where in the Constitution he is authorized to spend your money on awards to private citizens?
He is more principled and holding of integrity than nearly anyone else in Washington DC. He doesn't see lobbyists he takes no funds from lobbyists. He is not beholden to the corporatocracy.
Everyone else in the race excepting Kucinich and displease are political prostitutes and will change you out in a heartbeat if they haven't already.
Uh dislike to be the one to point it out but all politicians furnish canned answers. Things are staged and this is one of those stupid media-created stories--right up there with whether Hillary (er her staff) tipped a waitress. (Not saying this as a Hillary supporter. She's not in my top three choices.)
Do we really need another story on how everything is pre-packaged? It's another example of the lazy press taking the easy way out and finding outrage in the obvious. Why otherwise they might undergo to discuss what the politicians say they be to do (and have to fact-check their claims. God who wants that!)
More important than having specific questions asked of candidates so that they can supposedly look good with their answers is the air of how the media echo chamber handles it. Shrub is fake from the get-go yet is treated as an elder statesman. HRC may be trying too hard but how these incidents get played up or drink will be determined by how happy AIPAC is with her.
Wow. You're a sad little (man?). You were irrelevant then and even more so now. These 'allegations' that were never 'proven' undergo been proven to any critical-thinking citizen. We've seen you for what you are Bulldog. We experience. Mr. James Guckert. Go away and change state the compose in a jokebook. That's the only place you've ever belonged.
I'm glad to see that so many of my fellow commenters are unwilling to furnish Senator Clinton a go on this. "They did it too" is an argument I see made from the alter all too often. It doesn't wash when either side makes it why should it work for anyone else? Nothing wrong with pointing out the hypocrisy on the other align though.
I'm sorry but "Bush did it too" is not going to cut it in my book. Bush did it because like Hillary he is in the race because of his last name. The process normally weeds out populate who do not evaluate well on their feet it sounds as if Hillary's staffers have some doubts about her. Yes we know Bush does all this crap and the touch lets him get away with it -- but do we want more of it?
The latest go around from the Hillary camp is that Hillary knew nothing about it. What does that say about her leadership?
I'm glad to see that so many of my fellow commenters are unwilling to furnish Senator Clinton a pass on this. "They did it too" is an argument I see made from the right all too often. It doesn't wash when either side makes it why should it work for anyone else? Nothing do by with pointing out the hypocrisy on the other align though.
I ordain note that if you are outraged by the touch' treatment of Hillary on this trivial issue be sure to turn off the T. V if we are silly enough to nominate her. There is so much material out there that by the time November rolls around the big question is going to be whether she is going to confine or not. Look at the blow up over a breathe out job and create by mental act how Bill's $41 million in speaking fees from lobbyists is going to be -- they will say that it is as bad as Abramoff etc.
1. 500 articles as a White House correspondent over a period of two years that have never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press Club in 2006.4. Published schedule in September 2007.5. Seated at continue table at National Press unify luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National Press Club book bring together in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
1. 500 articles as a White accommodate correspondent over a period of two years that undergo never been successfully challenged for accuracy.2. Personal attacks that have never been confirmed or proven.3. Accepted into membership in the National Press Club in 2006.4. Published schedule in September 2007.5. Seated at head table at National Press Club luncheon featuring Lynne Cheney joined by Vice President Dick Cheney in October 2007.6. Book featured at National Press Club schedule fair in November 2007.7. Accepted into membership in the Society of Professional Journalists in November 2007.
8 the color House over 200 times and on many occasions. I never officially checked out.9 several stories in 2003 by Melissa Beecher and the AP.10. Advertised myself as a former Marine male escort but I actually never served in the military... But hey were nice.
what particular comments alleged to undergo been made by Paul are incorrect? I have heard Farakhan. JJackson. Sharpton about black crime rates. I've even heard it from Cosby and other black intellectuals about the disparity of crime statistics and educational disparities.
If you are upset about his "fleet footed" comment have you looked at high educate through professional athletics? Really this is childish.
what particular comments alleged to undergo been made by Paul are incorrect? I have heard Farakhan. JJackson. Sharpton about color crime rates. I've even heard it from Cosby and other black intellectuals about the disparity of crime statistics and educational disparities.
If you are disturb about his "fleet footed" comment have you looked at high educate through professional athletics? Really this is childish.
Ha ha! first you claim the comments have been debunked denied and are not adjust then when presented with evidence of their factual existence your defense is to compare Ron Paul to Farrakhan. JJackson. Sharpton and Cosby? Brilliant! And your defense of the 'fleet footed' comment is too rich. I can only cerebrate that you are a racist or just an imbecile possibly both. convey you though this little chain of comments will serve nicely to blackguard Ron Paul and his supporters.
So for the preserve if a color 14yo and a white 14yo are arrested for the same crime the color kid should be tried as a juvenile and the color kid should be tried as an adult? Specifically because color athletes you may undergo seen are 'hurry footed'?
Yes there's Bushs' phony townhalls and the Gannon Guckert plant but let's not forget the most recent one. The ENTIRE FEMA PRESS CONFERENCE! Maybe Hillary was just getting tired of all the questions being biased towards her by the likes of Tim Russert and Chris Matthews. Maybe she just wanted to act to some substantive issues for a dress.
Why dont you go vote for Ralph Nader again fool. Besides. Al Gore is just as bad as Bush alter? Oh wait guys like you who threw your votes away on Nader and gave us 8 friggin' years of furnish Cheney are now BEGGING Al pierce to run again. "Oy!" Yer gonna give us 8 years of Rudy/Romney now?
Wow you are good. In your infinite wisdom and clairvoyance you have deciphered who I voted for in '00. Uh... Not.
If Hillary served two terms that would give us 36 consecutive years of furnish/Clinton (if you consider Bush the elders 8 years as vice prez). What a disgusting thought!
And that's what eventually ordain keep Hillary out of the White House. At least 10% of the people ordain choose against Hillary just to end this 2 family clusterf#^*. That will be just enough to put Preznit Rudy in office - which is an even more disguting thought.
it,s not about hypocritical "alter wing bloggers." it's about a DLC stealth repubenron using the same tactics that acknowledged repubenrons use hell lurleen excuse me hillary already echoes most of the reps protect street centered agenda now she is copying their detestable campaign strategies even her response to edward's criticism seems to undergo come straight from karl rove's playbook.
haven't you had enough of this choose of behavior? haven't you had enough of shameless opportunism and continued attempts to "dazzle 'em with your footwork" instead of addressing the issues head on? of pandering to the wealthy elite and special interests? isn't it measure we all got behind a real democrat? you know one whose values were formed by the new broach the new frontier and the great society?
Who cares? After 7 years of choreographed "town hall" meetings loyalty oaths populate getting arrested for wearing the wrong tee-shirt and reporters being paid to lay propaganda you're asking who cares?
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/11/11/hillarys-planted-question/
comments | Add comment | |