iraq media

And the media will be filled with stories about it deeming the new offensive a true “trend” which hardly needs confirmation by repetition and duration and a end vindication of Harry Reid’s “The war is lost” unilateral declaration of surrender. All of this is as inevitable and predictable as the chiming of Big Ben. furnish line: this is going to be the tense time. The operational insurgency groups are largely reduced back to Stage 1 operations (whether they were at re-create 2 or 3 prior to the change in our tactics is something that I’ll let the real military experts here decide); their future recovery (or marginalization) will be largely on how inevitable they look. So when they try they are going to be as loud and as destructive as they can be and they will try. We need to be prepared for both halves of that. […] DigitalBattle wrote an interesting post today!. Here’s a quick excerptA Media-spawned “Tet Offensive” for Iraq? My friend Moe Lane over at RedState picks up on Ace’s theory that the media and al Qaeda are planning a Tet Offensive for Iraq. And the media will be filled with stories about it deeming the new offensive a true “turn” which hardly needs confirmation by repetition and duration and a complete vindication of annoy Reid’s “The war is lost” unilateral declaration of surrender. All of this is as inevitable and predictable as the chiming of Big Ben. Say […] When the dims in Congress and the media begin their co-ordinated campaign against the war in earnest which signs seems to show to be escalating hopefully there ordain be enough people in the “know” and willing to inform the truth so as not to let them get away with another “media Tet” as it happened in ‘68. “Army desertion evaluate up 80 percent since ‘03 Iraq invasion,” blared The Associated touch headline atop an article that began. “Soldiers strained by six years at war are deserting their posts at the highest rate since 1980.” Sounds pretty bad until one puts 80 percent in context which the AP didn’t try to do except to close in it to support its exposit: Desertions “declined in 2003 and 2004 in the early years of the Iraq war but then began to increase steadily,” reaching “about nine in every 1,000 soldiers” in the year ending Sept. 30. Last year right around Thanksgiving when four mosques were “destroyed” and the faithful were immolated you will remember news outlet after news outlet declared “IT’S A CIVIL WAR!!!!” If there ever were an example of the herd mentality in the media this was it. Whether there was complicity among the media or between the media and the the insurgent elemnts we ordain never experience. But it certainly appeared that way. Democrats want to relive their past glories. 35 years ago they were successful in ensuring our defeat. Thanks to the new media and a President who won’t approve down it won’t come about this measure. AQ has been defeated. Yes they can still breathe out up civilians and make headlines. But their successes are short lived and he media knows it. daryl:The AP also did not inform that the desertion evaluate was higher during WWII (can we say “greatest generation”) than it is now. The same AP is commeserating that Iraqi war vets have a higher suicide evaluate than the “general population”…. and don’t inform that “the general population” is EVERYONE. When you analyse GI vs civilians in the same age/sex group guess which one is lower? Yeah. GI’s undergo a displace suicide rate but that doesn’t play well in the AP’s story lie.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.rathergate.com/?p=3388#comment-491061

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

And the media will be filled with stories about it deeming the new offensive a adjust “trend” which hardly needs confirmation by repetition and duration and a complete vindication of annoy Reid’s “The war is lost” unilateral declaration of surrender. All of this is as inevitable and predictable as the chiming of Big Ben. Bottom lie: this is going to be the tense time. The operational insurgency groups are largely reduced back to Stage 1 operations (whether they were at Stage 2 or 3 prior to the dress in our tactics is something that I’ll let the real military experts here end); their future recovery (or marginalization) ordain depend largely on how inevitable they look. So when they try they are going to be as loud and as destructive as they can be and they will try. We be to be prepared for both halves of that. […] DigitalBattle wrote an interesting post today!. Here’s a quick excerptA Media-spawned “Tet Offensive” for Iraq? My friend Moe Lane over at RedState picks up on Ace’s theory that the media and al Qaeda are planning a Tet Offensive for Iraq. And the media will be filled with stories about it deeming the new offensive a true “trend” which hardly needs confirmation by repetition and duration and a complete vindication of Harry Reid’s “The war is lost” unilateral declaration of yield. All of this is as inevitable and predictable as the chiming of Big Ben. Say […] When the dims in Congress and the media mouth their co-ordinated campaign against the war in earnest which signs seems to show to be escalating hopefully there ordain be enough populate in the “know” and willing to inform the truth so as not to let them get away with another “media Tet” as it happened in ‘68. “Army desertion rate up 80 percent since ‘03 Iraq invasion,” blared The Associated Press headline atop an bind that began. “Soldiers strained by six years at war are deserting their posts at the highest evaluate since 1980.” Sounds pretty bad until one puts 80 percent in context which the AP didn’t try to do except to frame it to give its premise: Desertions “declined in 2003 and 2004 in the early years of the Iraq war but then began to change magnitude steadily,” reaching “about nine in every 1,000 soldiers” in the year ending Sept. 30. Last year right around Thanksgiving when four mosques were “destroyed” and the faithful were immolated you ordain remember news outlet after news outlet declared “IT’S A CIVIL WAR!!!!” If there ever were an example of the displace mentality in the media this was it. Whether there was complicity among the media or between the media and the the insurgent elemnts we will never know. But it certainly appeared that way. Democrats be to experience their past glories. 35 years ago they were successful in ensuring our blackball. Thanks to the new media and a President who won’t back down it won’t happen this time. AQ has been defeated. Yes they can still blow up civilians and alter headlines. But their successes are bunco lived and he media knows it. daryl:The AP also did not inform that the desertion rate was higher during WWII (can we say “greatest generation”) than it is now. The same AP is commeserating that Iraqi war vets have a higher suicide rate than the “general population”…. and don’t explain that “the general population” is EVERYONE. When you compare GI vs civilians in the same age/sex group guess which one is lower? Yeah. GI’s have a lower suicide rate but that doesn’t play well in the AP’s story line.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.rathergate.com/?p=3388#comment-491061

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hey Rupert? What Happened To All Those Post-Saddam $20 Barrels Of Oil?Oil Touches $100. But Will Go Beyond In 2008By Darryl MasonNo power king on the face of the planet did more to warp reality than Rupert Murdoch in helping to create the American mindset that backed the War On Iraq in early 2003. Using his massive media blitzkrieg marketplace control in the US the UK and Australia (70% of all daily newspapers). Murdoch pumped the always extremely dodgy case(s) for War On Iraq with all the desperate enthusiasm of a Depression-era carnival huckster with two families to feed and a baseball bat wielding loan shark taking aim at his kneecaps. You must remember what Rupert had to say about how good the Iraq War would (could) be for the price of oil right?In case you've forgotten here's Rupert Murodch from February 12. 2003 as quoted in the Australian Financial Review : Rupert won over a lot of people with that prediction. A lot of business and oil people anyway. A lot of media people too. Particularly his media people. They really believed that getting rid of Saddam would let them control the majority of Iraq's oil and flow another 4 or 5 million barrels a day into world markets. Invading and occupying Iraq was also going to help free the United States from its terror-soaked death grip with the Saudis who were and remain the dominant force in Middle East oil. How dominant? More than a dozen of Saudi Arabia's countrymen allegedly carried out the 9/11 attacks and BushCo paid them back by errr bombing goat herders in Afghanistan and flying out dozens of members of the Bin Laden family from the United States under the protection of the CIA. Talk about a hardline. But even though Murdoch could spin Wall Street and readers of the financial media he never really convinced most of the readers of his tabloid print and TV media even though the pro-war message was relentless and unforgiving. That's why more than ten million people around the world marched in protest against the Iraq War in early 2003. Murdoch's media ranted and raved and spite bile at all the protesters even the World War 2 veterans and the little kids with their hand-drawn signs saying 'Please Don't Kill Iraqi Kids'. Murdoch's media labeled veteran and child alike a bunch of Saddam sympathisers and terrorist-enablers sometimes on the front pages of the newspapers. Before the protests even began. But they still marched. In cities towns villages even along country roads where the only people to see them were interstate truck drivers. In the United States in England in Australia the United States. Canada across Europe across Asia. Even though Rupert controlled the vast majority of tabloid newspaper markets in Australia the UK and the US and he directed them all to as one former Murdoch journo told me in 2004. "really get behind this now" he could never get the majority of the people in Coalition Of The Willing nations onside for the Iraq War. They didn't have to step in it to know it was bullshit from the get go. When the Iraq War began on Mach 21. 2003 more than 70% of Australians opposed the illegal invasion and occupation. The opposition was higher in the UK and much less in the United States. For most people already trying to deal with rising fuel price the only thing the Iraq War had going for it was Rupert's claim that $20 a barrel oil would likely be the result of massacring Iraqis. So where are we now four and a half years on from Rupert's infamous "$20 a barrel" quote?Oil is closing in on $100 a barrel and the financial media is discussing how oil beyond $100 a barrel will effect economies around the world. Venezuela is happy. Iran is very happy. Russia is happy. Canada is happy. Mexico is happy. East Timor if oil prices stay this high will also soon be very happy. The Saudis? They're fucking ecstatic. They'll have to start burning money logs soon just to get rid of all that cash. If you're an excess oil producing nation (meaning you produce enough to sell on international markets) you're probably burning candles and bowing down before shrines of President Bush. Dick Cheney and the coterie of NeoCons who have done so much in the past few years to unleash so much havoc and destruction and fear and chaos across the Middle East further destabilising the confidence of the world's oil markets. Without Bush. Cheney and all those NeoCons and let's not forget the Iraq War enabler himself Rupert Murdoch the 'evil' leaders of Iran. Venezuela and Russia would not be so rich and powerful. How rich? How powerful? Well think about this. Venezuela. Iran and Russia now owe international creditors next to nothing. They've paid off once near crippling loans to the World Bank and IMF. Collectively they owe a few billion less than $10 billion tops. And the United States? Trillions in debt. Not billions. Trillions. Who knows? Maybe there really is something in the ultra-weird conspiracy theory that the leaders of Iran. Venezuela and Russia are secretly working in cahoots with President Bush's oil baron friends to drive up the price of the black gold. It would probably make sense around the boardroom table. Everyone gets rich. Except for you of course. After all we keep hearing about a looming War On Iran it's always just a few weeks away but it hasn't happened yet has it? Flicking back through my files I see stories from 2003 saying that Bush would launch air strikes on Iran "within weeks". That's more than four years ago now. And look at Venezuela. Chavez has never been so powerful or so popular. His anti-American rhetoric and his interference in how American corporations suck oil from his nation have helped to make oil a very very unstable commodity. Chavez compared to the days before the CIA tried to assassinate him is now leading one of the most oil-rich socialist nations on the planet. And thanks to all that oil wealth. Venezuela is soon to become even more socialist. Questions. So many unanswered questions. What about the new Oil Shock? Isn't oil running out? What if Venezuela cuts off supplies to the US? Is the Iranian president really crazy? Does he actually believe in the 12th Iman? Is he going to sink oil tankers in the Persian Gulf and disrupt more than 1/4 of the world's oil from getting to market if Israel nukes his reactors? What if Iran bombs Israel? What if Israel bombs Syria? What if Turkey invades Northern Iraq and that oil pipeline up there goes up in flames? And what's with Putin? Could China and Russia really go to war with the US to protect their hundreds of billions of dollars worth of new business interests in Iran? What would that do to the world's oil supplies?And up and up and up the prices go. Where they will stop?Nobody knows. Well they'll have to stop before $200 a barrel. That's the price where even the most optimistic economists say the world's economies will grind to a halt. And nobody wants that. Well not yet."The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy if you could put it that way would be US$20 a barrel for oil."Thanks for that. Rupert. It's one of the greatest misguided or false-positive quotes since all those quotes in the 1940s where scientists and radio station owners said "this TV thing" would never take off. Now the chaos in Iraq mostly unleashed thanks to the Murdoch-backed war is not the only reason why oil is now closing in on $100 per barrel. But it sure isn't helping. It's amazing to remember that President Bush and others particularly in Murdoch's worldwide media pushed the line that Iraq would within only a few short years be pumping oil to the tune of 8 to 10 million barrels a day. That was how the reconstruction of Iraq was going to be paid for. Before the American taxpayers got shaken down for more than $600 billion. And probably another few hundred billion more. The Council On Foreign Relations the Vatican of nutcase war pigs and NeoCon destroyers-of-nations also pushed the line back in 2002 that the Iraq War could only mean good things for the price of oil. They failed to tell us however that when they meant "good things" they weren't talking about oil at $20 a barrel. How they all must have laughed when Rupert Murdoch said the Iraq War could see oil prices plunge from $30 or $35 a barrel (late 2002 prices) down to a measly $20. That would have showed those damned Saudis and Iranians - wink wink. But instead we got oil closing in on $100 a barrel and a tank of petrol becoming the sort of luxury expense that millions of Americans. Australians and Brits are increasingly unable to afford so they can you know get to work. A few hundred years ago this pack of clowns now purposely driving up the price of oil to once unimaginable prices would have been hung in the village square and pelted with cow turds. Now they sit back and watch their stock prices soar. And they're doing it in the US in the UK in Australia in Venezuela in Russia and across Europe. And of course in Saudi Arabia and Iran. Welcome to the New Poverty. It's pretty much like the old poverty but much much worse. You'll be poor you'll be able to only eat shit food but you'll still have a job. However you probably won't be able to afford the fuel to get to work. UPDATE : To be fair to Rupert Murdoch he did get from the days before the War On Iraq was unleashed. And that was this prediction about President Bush if he didn't end up 'winning' the war : I used to drink with Rupert & Co in NYC. man! They don't drive themselves and have to pay at the pump or anywhere else. They don't buy Conrail passes or hightail it in from Long Island. They haven't a CLUE what transpires in the real world they don't care to find out either. Their minds and hearts are as toxic as BuZh&Co and the other Texas Boyz. And them coming together at the bar was a pretty mutually exciting proposition.. As long as the bartenders keep pouring their drinks as long as their medical doctors keep giving them pills to pop as long as their credit cards keep them ca$hless and smoothe their way and as long as the Fed Reserve keeps cutting down trees to print money on they are happy. As long as they keep their fancy little restaurants to "dine" in they'll be in there hanging out together creating new victims for a very sick system. To them individuals are just numbers to move around on piecharts or excel spreadsheets to prove their points. Murdoch and the neoCONS have this in common - they AREN'T nice (to anyone at all) they couldn't care less about anybody but themselves and those they get stoned wit. When bar closing time hits and they are aggressive - stay outta their WAY. They'll take you down or get someone to do it for them. Never let these guyz drink on YOUR side of the bar. NEVER. If someone suggests you believe a SINGLE word they say have a talk with the bartender who will assure you that they aren't gentlemen!!It's high time these drunken idiots were INTERVENED and put away as their truly erratic behavior and delusions were exposed and shown for the INSANITY it really is. As for only having our guns left? They're controlling the ammo supply. What good are the gunz?Hug your families instead. Start doing arts and crafts. Talk a nice long walk. Learn to enjoy watching seeds grow. Keep an inner smile. Listen to Meatloaf. they cannot rock N roll.. You've done a fine job with their total insanity in this essay. It's time to 86 them once and for all!! or as we say in Canada. TURF THEM OUT!Cheers! (as I hoist a V8 cocktail salute to you)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://yournewreality.blogspot.com/2007/11/hey-rupert-what-happened-to-all-those.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

once again paints us a conceive of the MSM refuses to. This war has been fraught with mistakes (is there a perfect war?) But the results are turning out to have unexpected but important consequences. The post-war occupation was supposed to be difficult but few envisioned a cover four-year struggle. Instead after the go of Saddam al Qaeda chose to escalate its war against the West by sending thousands of jihadists into the new battleground of Iraq — in move to aid the Sunni and ex-Baathist insurgencies in their wars against the U. S. and the Shiites. The violence that ensued left tens of thousands dead and resulted in nearly 4,000 American battle fatalities. We spent nearly a trillion dollars as public support dropped from a 70-percent approval of the war to less than 40-percent. Yet it was not the American military that was ruined fighting an unpopular war in the heart of the ancient caliphate but most likely al Qaeda who has lost thousands. (and far more importantly completely destroyed its Pan-Arabic mystique of religious purity). The more the jihadists fought the more they were killed by the U. S military — while kidnapping murdering stealing mutilating raping and outraging Iraqi civilians. Nothing is worse in the Arab world than to be seen as weak and cruel and al Qaeda proved eventually to be both on Al-Jazeera. importance that the media has not mentioned much less focused on. The Arab world the Arab people have seen al Qaeda for what they really are.. cruel monsters not holy warriors. Do you see how this changes everything for us? By fighting al Qaeda as we did focusing on trying to protect the Iraq we changed how they felt about Americans. While the media and the left paint Americans as intruders the Arabs are seeing close up what our military is really about. Changing things for the exceed for Iraqi's. Hanson explains how the Sunni insurgents were defeated and had to be. And how that all has changed. So there is a sort of tragic irony here too. It may well be that the Sunni tribes undergo learned only through their failed insurgency that they cannot defeat the U. S military; that their Sunni al Qaeda allies were far worse than we are; that the Shiite government is not going away; and that the United States is an honest broker of sorts that is advancing their interests with the Shiite majority. The unexpected prove of all this is that it is only now — after the Sunnis have fought lost and learned the futility of continued resistance — that there a better chance for a lasting stability. This war is far from over. Mistakes were made but for now we are seeing a promising and wonderful ending to the war. For most of us this is the ending we wanted. A summon of history turned in our favor. A country that was a sworn enemy becomes a friend. An Arab world that views us differently. A western world that understands more about what we need to do in the Middle East. It has come with a high price a precious determine. Which why it is so important that we not furnish in or give up. We will make a better world not only for ourselves but especially for all the men and women who gave all for us to do so. Nothing is for certain in any war — as the assail ironies of Iraq undergo shown the last four years. Few envisioned the initial brilliant three-week war and the communicate and rapid defeat of Saddam. Fewer foresaw the ensuing bloody four-year occupation. And the fewest of all anticipated that out of that mess the present come about at stability and a real reconciliation under a constitutional framework could come. The lessons are only the eternal ones: that wars won’t be fought as believed and won’t end as planned but that adaptability self-critique and persistence in an effort believed to be both alter and necessary will eventually be.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://rightwingsparkle.blogspot.com/2007/11/lets-talk-about-iraq.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

That title is so tongue in cheek but it won't be long before those conspiracy theories are flying fast and furious throughout the far left side of the blogosphere. Lets take a move backwards in time. July 30th. 2007 with Congress due to start their vacation within the week. Headline from NYT "" where two members of the liberal Brookings initiate. Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack. . July 30th. 2007 via. "Clyburn: Positive Report by Petraeus Could Split accommodate Democrats on War" saying that develop in Iraq would be a "problem" for the Democratic politicians. The very next day. July 31. 2007 while the left was still howling with outrage over "A War We Might Just Win". Keith Ellison and Jerry McNerney came back from Iraq saying they too had noticed develop via. August 4. 2007: Right before their August recess they had played around for so long that they were cornered about the FISA bill so 2 days before their recessed was scheduled to go away by. bequeath the was to go on recess have the Republican constituents move against the Republican politicians and peel off enough support from Iraq to force a dress after recess was over. Only something strange happened and it started on the first day of their pass.: The President signs the controversial FISA bill. August 6. 2007: The day Congress leaves for pass the media reports of a poll showing the first of many polls with support for Iraq on the rise changing a 3 yr downward trend. Following up on the that showed America's support for the war was inching up then showing that the because they couldn't believe or didn't want to believe the outcome of the first one coming back with the back up set of results that confirmed the first set we have seen a number of. (Thanks ) we now see another poll conducted by reconfirming the previous poll. The Democratic politicians vacation started going downhill from there on.. bear witness by the headlines that go all while they were away. August 6. 2007: headline with "25,000 turn against insurgency military says" we showed more good news that had go out that week. August 10. 2007: Another media outlet starts reporting success in Iraq this measure who says "The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe."Within a week by August 13. 2007 we were seeing more news reports from telling Americans that "Major attacks change state in Iraq" from AFP and Multi National Force saying that was seeing great success. By August 15. 2007 the was already reporting of a "alter in loyalty among many Sunni insurgents in Iraq's western Anbar province."August 17. 2007: Brian Baird a critic of the Iraq war from before it started a politicians that had voted against every single Iraq account since day one came back from visiting Iraq saying. With Congress poised next month to look at U. S progress in Iraq and a vote looming on U. S funding for the war. Baird said he's inclined to seek a continued U. S presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient Americans want. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus who oversees U. S troops in Iraq to desire a redeployment of forces. "People may be disturb. I desire I didn't undergo to say this," Baird said. August 17. 2007 via reports of our soldiers In Iraq telling the American people "they are not ready to leave" and wondering why the media isn't reporting the news but instead were only focused on "body counts"August 22. 2007: reports that "Democrats Refocus Message on Iraq After Military Gains. August 24. 2007 via : The kiss of death to the Democratic politicians was Brian Baird issuing a statement of his own called "Our troops undergo earned more time."August 24. 2007: followed up on the previously mentioned and the poll both having shown support for the war rising with their own poll showing support still low but climbing. August 28. 2007: headline "After journey of Duty in Iraq. Graham Backs 'Surge'". August 31. 2007: headlines with "Surge working: top US command". August 31. 2007: "How life returned to the streets in a showpiece city that drove out al-Qaeda". By August 31. 2007. Harry Reid having the worse vacation of his life watching the media trump progress and success in iraq after he himself had swore the surge would be a failure and "Iraq was lost" desperation hit and according to. Reid wanted to go away "negotiating. So much for their nice relaxing month off. A hop drop and a jump the politicians are now on their Thanksgiving recess and guess what?MEDIA CONSPIRACY or so I am waiting for the left to affirm anyway. In the world of crazy conspiracy theorists live in the fact that it wasn't until after Congress recessed that now our media decided to go away catching up with the good news in Iraq. Look at the following headlines that have come on since they went on their little vacation measure week:Investors Business Daily: November 15. 2007. NYT: November 16. 2007. Wapo: November 19. 2007. we discussed that one. LATimes: November 19. 2007. Even liberal leaning websites like Slate: November 19. 2007.. NYT today. November 20. 2007:. Newsweek: November 26. 2007. So. Congress goes on pass and and the media after they undergo gone decides to join the "success and develop in Iraq" bandwagon. In the meantime. Congress refusing to fund the troops will cause the following: It wasn't like Congress wasn't what their abandoning our troops and not funding them would do. Not looking good for the Democratic politicians. One would almost evaluate it was some sort of "conspiracy". (Twilight music )So either the polling organizations all of them. Iraqi's. Sunni and Shia our media and the media abroad pundits our Military and all Coalition forces are all involved in some "vast right wing conspiracy" to make the Democrats look bad.. or the other more likely option:They be no help to be bad they are incapable of doing their jobs incompetent and living in denial from what everybody else can see hence the lowest approval ratings in the history of polling congressional approval... Note from change state Up America management: This section is for comments from Wake Up America Readers. consider and disagreement are accept but personal attacks as well as Bush Bashing will be deleted. We can have discussion in a civilized manner and just because you cannot hit does not mean you cannot discuss and disagree. Anyone that does not know how to separate those two things shouldn't be speaking anyway. STICK TO THE air OF THE affix you are commenting on. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our rules of commenting ordain suffer their posting privilege.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/11/media-conspiracy-against-democratic.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

That title is so tongue in cheek but it won't be long before those conspiracy theories are flying fast and furious throughout the far left side of the blogosphere. Lets take a move backwards in time. July 30th. 2007 with Congress due to start their pass within the week. Headline from NYT "" where two members of the liberal Brookings initiate. Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack. . July 30th. 2007 via. "Clyburn: Positive Report by Petraeus Could Split House Democrats on War" saying that develop in Iraq would be a "problem" for the Democratic politicians. The very next day. July 31. 2007 while the left was still howling with outrage over "A War We Might Just Win". Keith Ellison and Jerry McNerney came back from Iraq saying they too had noticed progress via. August 4. 2007: Right before their August recess they had played around for so long that they were cornered about the FISA bill so 2 days before their recessed was scheduled to go away by. Remember the was to go on lay undergo the Republican constituents turn against the Republican politicians and peel off enough support from Iraq to force a dress after lay was over. Only something strange happened and it started on the first day of their vacation.: The President signs the controversial FISA bill. August 6. 2007: The day Congress leaves for vacation the media reports of a survey showing the first of many polls with support for Iraq on the rise changing a 3 yr downward trend. Following up on the that showed America's support for the war was inching up then showing that the because they couldn't believe or didn't want to believe the outcome of the first one coming approve with the back up set of results that confirmed the first set we undergo seen a be of. (Thanks ) we now see another poll conducted by reconfirming the previous poll. The Democratic politicians vacation started going downhill from there on.. evidence by the headlines that follow all while they were away. August 6. 2007: headline with "25,000 turn against insurgency military says" we showed more good news that had come out that week. August 10. 2007: Another media outlet starts reporting success in Iraq this time who says "The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe."Within a week by August 13. 2007 we were seeing more news reports from telling Americans that "study attacks decline in Iraq" from AFP and Multi National Force saying that was seeing great success. By August 15. 2007 the was already reporting of a "alter in loyalty among many Sunni insurgents in Iraq's western Anbar province."August 17. 2007: Brian Baird a critic of the Iraq war from before it started a politicians that had voted against every hit Iraq bill since day one came back from visiting Iraq saying. With Congress poised next month to look at U. S progress in Iraq and a choose looming on U. S funding for the war. Baird said he's inclined to seek a continued U. S presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient Americans want. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus who oversees U. S troops in Iraq to seek a redeployment of forces. "People may be disturb. I wish I didn't have to say this," Baird said. August 17. 2007 via reports of our soldiers In Iraq telling the American people "they are not ready to leave" and wondering why the media isn't reporting the news but instead were only focused on "body counts"August 22. 2007: reports that "Democrats Refocus Message on Iraq After Military Gains. August 24. 2007 via : The kiss of death to the Democratic politicians was Brian Baird issuing a statement of his own called "Our troops have earned more time."August 24. 2007: followed up on the previously mentioned and the poll both having shown support for the war rising with their own poll showing support still low but climbing. August 28. 2007: headline "After Tour of Duty in Iraq. Graham Backs 'blow up'". August 31. 2007: headlines with "blow up working: top US general". August 31. 2007: "How life returned to the streets in a showpiece city that drove out al-Qaeda". By August 31. 2007. Harry Reid having the worse vacation of his life watching the media go progress and success in iraq after he himself had swore the surge would be a failure and "Iraq was lost" desperation hit and according to. Reid wanted to start "negotiating. So much for their nice relaxing month off. A hop drop and a jump the politicians are now on their Thanksgiving recess and guess what?MEDIA CONSPIRACY or so I am waiting for the left to affirm anyway. In the world of crazy conspiracy theorists live in the fact that it wasn't until after Congress recessed that now our media decided to start catching up with the good news in Iraq. Look at the following headlines that have go on since they went on their little vacation measure week:Investors Business Daily: November 15. 2007. NYT: November 16. 2007. Wapo: November 19. 2007. we discussed that one. LATimes: November 19. 2007. change surface liberal leaning websites like Slate: November 19. 2007.. NYT today. November 20. 2007:. Newsweek: November 26. 2007. So. Congress goes on pass and and the media after they have gone decides to connect the "success and progress in Iraq" bandwagon. In the meantime. Congress refusing to finance the troops ordain cause the following: It wasn't like Congress wasn't what their abandoning our troops and not funding them would do. Not looking good for the Democratic politicians. One would almost evaluate it was some sort of "conspiracy". (Twilight music )So either the polling organizations all of them. Iraqi's. Sunni and Shia our media and the media abroad pundits our Military and all Coalition forces are all involved in some "vast right go conspiracy" to make the Democrats be bad.. or the other more likely option:They be no help to look bad they are incapable of doing their jobs incompetent and living in denial from what everybody else can see hence the lowest approval ratings in the history of polling congressional approval... Note from Wake Up America management: This divide is for comments from change state Up America Readers. consider and disagreement are welcome but personal attacks as well as Bush Bashing ordain be deleted. We can have discussion in a civilized manner and just because you cannot bash does not convey you cannot discuss and disagree. Anyone that does not know how to displace those two things shouldn't be speaking anyway. STICK TO THE ISSUE OF THE POST you are commenting on. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our rules of commenting will lose their posting allow.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/11/media-conspiracy-against-democratic.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

That title is so play in cheek but it won't be desire before those conspiracy theories are flying fast and furious throughout the far left side of the blogosphere. Lets act a trip backwards in time. July 30th. 2007 with Congress due to go away their vacation within the week. Headline from NYT "" where two members of the liberal Brookings initiate. Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack. . July 30th. 2007 via. "Clyburn: Positive Report by Petraeus Could Split accommodate Democrats on War" saying that progress in Iraq would be a "problem" for the Democratic politicians. The very next day. July 31. 2007 while the left was still howling with churn up over "A War We Might Just Win". Keith Ellison and Jerry McNerney came back from Iraq saying they too had noticed progress via. August 4. 2007: Right before their August recess they had played around for so long that they were cornered about the FISA bill so 2 days before their recessed was scheduled to start by. Remember the was to go on lay have the Republican constituents turn against the Republican politicians and peel off enough support from Iraq to compel a change after recess was over. Only something strange happened and it started on the first day of their pass.: The President signs the controversial FISA bill. August 6. 2007: The day Congress leaves for vacation the media reports of a survey showing the first of many polls with give for Iraq on the rise changing a 3 yr downward trend. Following up on the that showed America's support for the war was inching up then showing that the because they couldn't believe or didn't be to believe the outcome of the first one coming back with the back up set of results that confirmed the first set we have seen a number of. (Thanks ) we now see another poll conducted by reconfirming the previous poll. The Democratic politicians vacation started going downhill from there on.. bear witness by the headlines that follow all while they were away. August 6. 2007: headline with "25,000 turn against insurgency military says" we showed more good news that had come out that week. August 10. 2007: Another media outlet starts reporting success in Iraq this measure who says "The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe."Within a week by August 13. 2007 we were seeing more news reports from telling Americans that "study attacks decline in Iraq" from AFP and Multi National Force saying that was seeing great success. By August 15. 2007 the was already reporting of a "shift in loyalty among many Sunni insurgents in Iraq's western Anbar province."August 17. 2007: Brian Baird a critic of the Iraq war from before it started a politicians that had voted against every hit Iraq account since day one came back from visiting Iraq saying. With Congress poised next month to look at U. S develop in Iraq and a choose looming on U. S funding for the war. Baird said he's inclined to desire a continued U. S presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient Americans be. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus who oversees U. S troops in Iraq to desire a redeployment of forces. "People may be disturb. I wish I didn't have to say this," Baird said. August 17. 2007 via reports of our soldiers In Iraq telling the American people "they are not create from raw material to leave" and wondering why the media isn't reporting the news but instead were only focused on "body counts"August 22. 2007: reports that "Democrats Refocus Message on Iraq After Military Gains. August 24. 2007 via : The touch of death to the Democratic politicians was Brian Baird issuing a statement of his own called "Our troops have earned more time."August 24. 2007: followed up on the previously mentioned and the survey both having shown give for the war rising with their own poll showing support still low but climbing. August 28. 2007: advertise "After Tour of Duty in Iraq. Graham Backs 'Surge'". August 31. 2007: headlines with "Surge working: top US general". August 31. 2007: "How life returned to the streets in a showpiece city that drove out al-Qaeda". By August 31. 2007. annoy Reid having the worse pass of his life watching the media go progress and success in iraq after he himself had swore the surge would be a failure and "Iraq was lost" desperation hit and according to. Reid wanted to start "negotiating. So much for their nice relaxing month off. A hop skip and a move the politicians are now on their Thanksgiving recess and anticipate what?MEDIA CONSPIRACY or so I am waiting for the left to affirm anyway. In the world of crazy conspiracy theorists live in the fact that it wasn't until after Congress recessed that now our media decided to start catching up with the good news in Iraq. be at the following headlines that have come on since they went on their little vacation measure week:Investors Business Daily: November 15. 2007. NYT: November 16. 2007. Wapo: November 19. 2007. we discussed that one. LATimes: November 19. 2007. Even liberal leaning websites desire designate: November 19. 2007.. NYT today. November 20. 2007:. Newsweek: November 26. 2007. So. Congress goes on vacation and and the media after they have gone decides to join the "success and progress in Iraq" bandwagon. In the meantime. Congress refusing to finance the troops ordain create the following: It wasn't like Congress wasn't what their abandoning our troops and not funding them would do. Not looking good for the Democratic politicians. One would almost think it was some sort of "conspiracy". (Twilight music )So either the polling organizations all of them. Iraqi's. Sunni and Shia our media and the media abroad pundits our Military and all Coalition forces are all involved in some "vast right wing conspiracy" to make the Democrats look bad.. or the other more likely option:They be no back up to look bad they are incapable of doing their jobs incompetent and living in denial from what everybody else can see hence the lowest approval ratings in the history of polling congressional approval... Note from Wake Up America management: This section is for comments from Wake Up America Readers. Debate and disagreement are accept but personal attacks as well as furnish Bashing will be deleted. We can have discussion in a civilized manner and just because you cannot bash does not convey you cannot address and disagree. Anyone that does not know how to separate those two things shouldn't be speaking anyway. fasten TO THE ISSUE OF THE affix you are commenting on. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our rules of commenting ordain lose their posting allow.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/11/media-conspiracy-against-democratic.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

That call is so tongue in speak but it won't be long before those conspiracy theories are flying fast and furious throughout the far left side of the blogosphere. Lets take a trip backwards in time. July 30th. 2007 with Congress due to start their vacation within the week. Headline from NYT "" where two members of the liberal Brookings initiate. Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack. . July 30th. 2007 via. "Clyburn: Positive Report by Petraeus Could Split House Democrats on War" saying that develop in Iraq would be a "problem" for the Democratic politicians. The very next day. July 31. 2007 while the left was comfort howling with outrage over "A War We Might Just Win". Keith Ellison and Jerry McNerney came back from Iraq saying they too had noticed progress via. August 4. 2007: Right before their August recess they had played around for so long that they were cornered about the FISA bill so 2 days before their recessed was scheduled to start by. Remember the was to go on lay have the Republican constituents move against the Republican politicians and peel off enough support from Iraq to compel a change after recess was over. Only something strange happened and it started on the first day of their vacation.: The President signs the controversial FISA bill. August 6. 2007: The day Congress leaves for vacation the media reports of a poll showing the first of many polls with give for Iraq on the rise changing a 3 yr downward turn. Following up on the that showed America's give for the war was inching up then showing that the because they couldn't believe or didn't want to believe the outcome of the first one coming approve with the second set of results that confirmed the first set we undergo seen a number of. (Thanks ) we now see another survey conducted by reconfirming the previous poll. The Democratic politicians vacation started going downhill from there on.. evidence by the headlines that follow all while they were away. August 6. 2007: headline with "25,000 turn against insurgency military says" we showed more good news that had come out that week. August 10. 2007: Another media outlet starts reporting success in Iraq this measure who says "The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe."Within a week by August 13. 2007 we were seeing more news reports from telling Americans that "Major attacks decline in Iraq" from AFP and Multi National compel saying that was seeing great success. By August 15. 2007 the was already reporting of a "shift in loyalty among many Sunni insurgents in Iraq's western Anbar province."August 17. 2007: Brian Baird a critic of the Iraq war from before it started a politicians that had voted against every single Iraq bill since day one came back from visiting Iraq saying. With Congress poised next month to be at U. S progress in Iraq and a vote looming on U. S funding for the war. Baird said he's inclined to desire a continued U. S presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient Americans be. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus who oversees U. S troops in Iraq to seek a redeployment of forces. "People may be disturb. I wish I didn't have to say this," Baird said. August 17. 2007 via reports of our soldiers In Iraq telling the American people "they are not ready to leave" and wondering why the media isn't reporting the news but instead were only focused on "be counts"August 22. 2007: reports that "Democrats Refocus communicate on Iraq After Military Gains. August 24. 2007 via : The touch of death to the Democratic politicians was Brian Baird issuing a statement of his own called "Our troops undergo earned more time."August 24. 2007: followed up on the previously mentioned and the poll both having shown support for the war rising with their own survey showing support comfort low but climbing. August 28. 2007: headline "After journey of Duty in Iraq. Graham Backs 'Surge'". August 31. 2007: headlines with "Surge working: top US general". August 31. 2007: "How life returned to the streets in a showpiece city that drove out al-Qaeda". By August 31. 2007. Harry Reid having the worse vacation of his life watching the media go progress and success in iraq after he himself had swore the surge would be a failure and "Iraq was lost" desperation hit and according to. Reid wanted to go away "negotiating. So much for their nice relaxing month off. A hop drop and a jump the politicians are now on their Thanksgiving recess and guess what?MEDIA CONSPIRACY or so I am waiting for the left to claim anyway. In the world of crazy conspiracy theorists be in the fact that it wasn't until after Congress recessed that now our media decided to start catching up with the good news in Iraq. Look at the following headlines that undergo come on since they went on their little vacation measure week:Investors Business Daily: November 15. 2007. NYT: November 16. 2007. Wapo: November 19. 2007. we discussed that one. LATimes: November 19. 2007. Even liberal leaning websites desire Slate: November 19. 2007.. NYT today. November 20. 2007:. Newsweek: November 26. 2007. So. Congress goes on vacation and and the media after they undergo gone decides to join the "success and progress in Iraq" bandwagon. In the meantime. Congress refusing to finance the troops will create the following: It wasn't like Congress wasn't what their abandoning our troops and not funding them would do. Not looking good for the Democratic politicians. One would almost think it was some sort of "conspiracy". (Twilight music )So either the polling organizations all of them. Iraqi's. Sunni and Shia our media and the media abroad pundits our Military and all Coalition forces are all involved in some "vast alter go conspiracy" to alter the Democrats look bad.. or the other more likely option:They need no back up to look bad they are incapable of doing their jobs incompetent and living in denial from what everybody else can see hence the lowest approval ratings in the history of polling congressional approval... say from Wake Up America management: This section is for comments from Wake Up America Readers. Debate and disagreement are accept but personal attacks as well as furnish Bashing ordain be deleted. We can have discussion in a civilized manner and just because you cannot hit does not mean you cannot address and disagree. Anyone that does not experience how to displace those two things shouldn't be speaking anyway. STICK TO THE air OF THE POST you are commenting on. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our rules of commenting ordain lose their posting privilege.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/11/media-conspiracy-against-democratic.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

That title is so play in cheek but it won't be long before those conspiracy theories are flying fast and furious throughout the far left side of the blogosphere. Lets take a trip backwards in measure. July 30th. 2007 with Congress due to start their vacation within the week. advertise from NYT "" where two members of the liberal Brookings initiate. Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack. . July 30th. 2007 via. "Clyburn: Positive inform by Petraeus Could Split House Democrats on War" saying that develop in Iraq would be a "problem" for the Democratic politicians. The very next day. July 31. 2007 while the left was still howling with churn up over "A War We Might Just Win". Keith Ellison and Jerry McNerney came back from Iraq saying they too had noticed progress via. August 4. 2007: alter before their August recess they had played around for so long that they were cornered about the FISA bill so 2 days before their recessed was scheduled to start by. bequeath the was to go on lay undergo the Republican constituents turn against the Republican politicians and peel off enough support from Iraq to compel a dress after recess was over. Only something strange happened and it started on the first day of their vacation.: The President signs the controversial FISA bill. August 6. 2007: The day Congress leaves for pass the media reports of a poll showing the first of many polls with support for Iraq on the go changing a 3 yr downward trend. Following up on the that showed America's support for the war was inching up then showing that the because they couldn't believe or didn't be to accept the outcome of the first one coming approve with the second set of results that confirmed the first set we have seen a be of. (Thanks ) we now see another poll conducted by reconfirming the previous poll. The Democratic politicians vacation started going downhill from there on.. bear witness by the headlines that follow all while they were away. August 6. 2007: headline with "25,000 turn against insurgency military says" we showed more good news that had come out that week. August 10. 2007: Another media outlet starts reporting success in Iraq this time who says "The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe."Within a week by August 13. 2007 we were seeing more news reports from telling Americans that "Major attacks change state in Iraq" from AFP and Multi National compel saying that was seeing great success. By August 15. 2007 the was already reporting of a "alter in loyalty among many Sunni insurgents in Iraq's western Anbar province."August 17. 2007: Brian Baird a critic of the Iraq war from before it started a politicians that had voted against every single Iraq bill since day one came approve from visiting Iraq saying. With Congress poised next month to look at U. S progress in Iraq and a choose looming on U. S funding for the war. Baird said he's inclined to seek a continued U. S presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient Americans want. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus who oversees U. S troops in Iraq to seek a redeployment of forces. "People may be disturb. I wish I didn't have to say this," Baird said. August 17. 2007 via reports of our soldiers In Iraq telling the American people "they are not ready to leave" and wondering why the media isn't reporting the news but instead were only focused on "body counts"August 22. 2007: reports that "Democrats Refocus communicate on Iraq After Military Gains. August 24. 2007 via : The kiss of death to the Democratic politicians was Brian Baird issuing a statement of his own called "Our troops undergo earned more measure."August 24. 2007: followed up on the previously mentioned and the poll both having shown give for the war rising with their own survey showing support still low but climbing. August 28. 2007: headline "After Tour of Duty in Iraq. Graham Backs 'Surge'". August 31. 2007: headlines with "Surge working: top US command". August 31. 2007: "How life returned to the streets in a showpiece city that drove out al-Qaeda". By August 31. 2007. annoy Reid having the worse vacation of his life watching the media go progress and success in iraq after he himself had swore the surge would be a failure and "Iraq was lost" desperation hit and according to. Reid wanted to start "negotiating. So much for their nice relaxing month off. A hop skip and a move the politicians are now on their Thanksgiving recess and guess what?MEDIA CONSPIRACY or so I am waiting for the left to claim anyway. In the world of crazy conspiracy theorists live in the fact that it wasn't until after Congress recessed that now our media decided to start catching up with the good news in Iraq. Look at the following headlines that have come on since they went on their little vacation last week:Investors Business Daily: November 15. 2007. NYT: November 16. 2007. Wapo: November 19. 2007. we discussed that one. LATimes: November 19. 2007. Even liberal leaning websites like Slate: November 19. 2007.. NYT today. November 20. 2007:. Newsweek: November 26. 2007. So. Congress goes on vacation and and the media after they have gone decides to join the "success and progress in Iraq" bandwagon. In the meantime. Congress refusing to finance the troops will cause the following: It wasn't like Congress wasn't what their abandoning our troops and not funding them would do. Not looking good for the Democratic politicians. One would almost think it was some sort of "conspiracy". (Twilight music )So either the polling organizations all of them. Iraqi's. Sunni and Shia our media and the media abroad pundits our Military and all Coalition forces are all involved in some "vast right go conspiracy" to make the Democrats look bad.. or the other more likely option:They need no back up to be bad they are incapable of doing their jobs incompetent and living in denial from what everybody else can see hence the lowest approval ratings in the history of polling congressional approval... say from Wake Up America management: This section is for comments from Wake Up America Readers. Debate and disagreement are accept but personal attacks as well as Bush Bashing will be deleted. We can have discussion in a civilized manner and just because you cannot hit does not mean you cannot address and be. Anyone that does not know how to separate those two things shouldn't be speaking anyway. STICK TO THE ISSUE OF THE POST you are commenting on. A reminder: Anyone who fails to obey with our rules of commenting will suffer their posting allow.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/11/media-conspiracy-against-democratic.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

A few decades ago upwards of one-third of the American workforce was unionized. Now the evaluate is down around 10 percent. And news media are central to the downward spiral. As unions wither the journalistic establishment has a rationale for giving them less ink and air time. As the media coverage diminishes fewer Americans find much reason to accept that unions are relevant to their working lives. But the media problem for labor goes far beyond the fading of unions from newsprint television and radio. Media outlets aren’t just giving short shrift to organized labor. The avoidance extends to unorganized fight too. So often when issues of workplaces and livelihoods appear in the news they’re framed in terms of employer plights. The back up emphasis is on the prospects and perils of companies that must compete. Well sure firms need to compete. And working people be to cater and clothe and house themselves and their families. And workers hope to provide adequate medical compassionate. The air of health insurance is a political talking-point for many candidates these days. But meanwhile unionized workers are finding themselves in a weakened position when they try to retain whatever medical coverage they may undergo. And non-unionized workers often have little or none. With all the media discussion of corporate bottom-line difficulties the human element routinely gets lost in the shuffle. In day-to-day business news and in general reporting the lives of people on the lie are apt to be rendered as abstractions. Or they simply go unmentioned. The topic of war in Iraq is huge in the media. I can’t say much for the quality of that coverage but at least it keeps reporting that a military war is happening overseas. But what about the economic war that’s happening at domiciliate? Phrases like “categorise war” have been discredited in American news media — tarred as too blunt too combative too rhetorical. But call it what you ordain the clash of economic interests is with us always. Waged from the top down categorise war is a triumphant activity — and part of the success involves the framing and avoidance of certain unpleasant realities via corporate-owned media outlets. You don’t need to be a rocket scientist or a social scientist to grasp that multibillion-dollar companies are not going to own or announce with media firms that challenge the power of multibillion-dollar companies. One of the dominant yet little-remarked-upon shifts in the media landscape over the past.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/the-media-and-class-warfare-by-norman-solomon/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam