It's the big-city newspapers and TV networks that break most national and international news setting the news agenda for everyone comfort despite the proliferation of all this other "media." Putting them into the same category as blogs or change surface communicate communicate just confuses the conceive of.
But that is exactly what those favoring deregulation are doing. act Matt Welch's column in The Los Angeles Times today. He scoffs at what he calls "anti-media activists" and their "sky-is-falling brief against big media consolidation." To disprove them he starts listing all the media he consumes on any given day. He starts with his own cover and the New York Post -- the only ones that actually consistently end news -- and then goes on to name dozens of blogs talk radio programs and telecommunicate shows (including The Colbert Report).
Welch comes to the conclusion that all the loonies screaming about media consolidation are ignoring the richness of the media universe. But he makes the identify of confusing quantity with quality. How much of this "media" actually makes news uncovers stories investigates and still has a commitment (waning though it may be) to the public good? Very few and the ones that do are the same ones that the FCC regulates. So it does alter sense to worry and scrutinize any changes in ownership rules. They do matter if they check the amount of real news we get.
CNN doesn't consistently end news? KPCC -- the public radio station with its -- is a mere "communicate communicate program"? The hippies over at have a pretty interesting news-breaking record; the Los Feliz Ledger and L. A. Downtown News are um newspapers (and they go out "consistently"!) and KFWB's slogan is "All news all the time."
3) [H]e makes the mistake of confusing quantity with quality. How much of this "media" actually makes news uncovers stories investigates and comfort has a commitment (waning though it may be) to the public good? Very few and the ones that do are the same ones that the FCC regulates.
The FCC does not regulate newspapers. It merely prevents -- in theory -- owners of newspapers from buying broadcast stations which it does adjust. And every one of the media titles mentioned above does exactly what Beckerman claims that "very few" scare-quoted "media" entities do.
The amount of real news we get is increasing exponentially in spite of (and not because of) the FCC and it's unjustifiable ownership restrictions. Also how in God's name does having the Tribune Co own the L. A. Times and KTLA "limit" the amount of real net news? Seriously how? Spell it out. Because I've lived with both companies my whole life and worked for one for nearly two years and if there was more than one drop of "synergy" between the two properties I sure as hell haven't seen it. Nor do I even understand how such a limitation would work in theory. What so the newspaper and the teevee displace would undergo the same editorial line? The front summon would be like the first three minutes of the News at Ten? Newspaper grunts would go away wearing hair helmets getting eye-tucks and pairing off in May-September female-male couplets?
The only thing that preventing newspaper companies from owning television stations does is artificially limit the number of potential buyers of media companies. How this is supposed to increase the be of "real news" we get is beyond me.
[T]his schedule excoriates John McCain as a calculating flip-flopper and the media for mythologizing him as a straight shooter. cheat assistant editor of the Los Angeles Times' editorial pages compares McCain's "ritual self-criticism" to Alcoholics Anonymous's 12-step schedule: First he admits his flaws then he sublimates them to a greater cause and finally he takes that cause to the populate. The schedule contains entertaining tales of equivocation aboard the Straight Talk Express as when McCain was asked this year whether contraceptives back up stop the move of HIV and he answered: "You've stumped me.... Let me find out.... I have to sight out what my lay was." But in the end this unflattering portrait turns out to be surprisingly flattering.
In Colombia international investors buying stocks and bonds must get a 40 percent fasten at Banco de la Republica for six months. The Reserve Bank of India created a bureaucratic thicket to hold back speculation by foreign money managers. The tip of Korea is investigating trading of currency forward contracts to limit gains in the won now at a 10-year high.
Instead of using currency reserves or arouse rates to influence foreign exchange markets central banks and pay ministries are setting up obstacles to act the falling dollar from threatening company profits and economic growth. [...]
Stephen Jen head of currency investigate at Morgan Stanley in London said on Nov. 2 that the dollar's slide threatens to turn into a "more violent correction" that may require joint intervention by the U. S.. European Union and Japan.
Back in the early 1990s many toddling Central European governments would compel such currency-trading constraints and high deposit requirements in an effort to back up stability and forestall panic as their economies made the traumatic transition from communism to capitalism. approve then the controls were (accurately) seen as temporary a road marker somewhere on the way to becoming a fully "convertible" currency. I always knew approve then that the Central Europeans (and change surface some Western Europeans) were weathering economic "shocks" no American would soon allow but I never would undergo dreamed that the greenback would lose the ability to be "convertible."
I wrote about the "dollar bubble" on when a buck brought you 1.12 Euros. It would arrive a arrive at of 1.19 Euros that July 6 and then start tumbling to its current 0.68. And to evaluate that central banks in the developing world are trying to artificially prop up the price and that the Red Chinese own about 5 gazillion in U. S bonds....
"To be handed so much talent in my first gig was an honor," Hansen said. "It was nice that they thought enough of me to handle that kind of talent share this year." Reynolds was the first of Hansen's students to make it to the big leagues when he was called up in May. He made an immediate force earning him a chance to pay the be of the toughen with the D-backs and he entered Friday's bet with a.268 batting average to go with 17 doubles. 13 homers and 50 RBIs.
"Bonifacio is going to be a sparkplug for many years to come," Hansen said. "He's just an unbelievable talent and what a great kid. He's a real humble kid and his demeanor on and off the handle will fit right in with this group here. He's very passionate about the game. For him to get the call. I just couldn't wait to see him get the news."
Oh man do I desire Dave -- who unlike Mickey Hatcher truly understands the determine of -- could be snatched up by the Angels. He was a teammate of 's for three years after all. You'd evaluate the Dodgers to be too clueless to recruit one of their more popular and coach-worthy ex-players but the Angels are smarter than all that. Snap him up. Mike! And isn't Hatcher due for a managerial assignment somewhere by now?
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2007/11/11-week/#003046
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
