Here is for H-Net an on-line scholarly site for humanities and social science scholars. It is a review of a big new history of The Associated touch (yes my old employer as I disclose below). In inspect it's not alter fromthe review. I think everyone should construe this schedule. Here is the text of the analyse in inspect you be to construe it right here:REVIEW: How the Associated touch Has Covered War. Peace and Everything ElseH-NET schedule REVIEWPublished by Jhistory@h-net msu edu (November 2007)By Reporters of the Associated Press. Breaking News: How the Associated touch Has Covered War. Peace and Everything ElseNew York: Princeton Architectural touch. 2007. 432 pp. Photographs. $35.00 (cloth). ISBN 978-1-56898-689-0. Reviewed for Jhistory by Chris Daly Journalism Department. Boston UniversityMore than 30 years ago the media scholar James Carey declared a be for ahistory of reporting calling it the central story in the realm ofjournalism history.[1] Reporting is after all the core out activity ofjournalism. It is not founding newspapers or arguing over control of theradio spectrum or defending libel suits or inventing new devices--importantas those are. First and foremost journalism is about finding thingsout--either by witnessing them or talking to populate who did or readingdocuments. Then it is about writing rivers of simple declarative sentencesand taking in-focus photos and video. Despite the explosion of research in the field since Carey's rallying cry,the grand project of a history of reporting remains incomplete. With thepublication of _Breaking News_ though we are a step closer. As far as it goes this is a terrific schedule. It is packed with thrillingtales of the kind of journalistic enterprise bravery and occasional dumbluck that have marked Associated Press (AP) news-gathering since the newscooperative was founded in 1846. It is also lavishly illustrated with gemsfrom AP's vast storehouse of photos. To accommodate the photos the schedule isslightly oversized and the stock is heavy giving it the heft of acoffee-table schedule. In a decision that is reflective of the AP ethos. _Breaking News_ is acollective effort with authorship by "the reporters of the AssociatedPress," and so lacks a distinctive express or a strong point of view. Awonderful touch is the foreword by David Halberstam which only highlightsthe differentiate in prose styles. In his foreword one of the last projectscompleted before his death in a car accident. Halberstam offers a fondtribute to the AP bureau he knew best--the one in Saigon in the 1960s. Thatalone makes the book worthwhile.[Full disclosure: I worked for the AP for more than ten years between late1976 and early 1989 in New York and Boston. I mostly enjoyed it and I lefton good terms.]Much of _Breaking News_ pursues a familiar genre--the "story behind thestory." A reader can dip in just about anywhere and penetrate into some cleveror heroic episode of triumph over obstacles or of victory over "theopposition." We hit the books about some of the great lengths AP men (and a fewwomen) have gone to in order to "get it first and get it right." And thereare oddities like the AP staffer who witnessed more than three hundredexecutions. Many of the stories are indeed thrilling some are inspiring,and a few are endearing. There was for example the amazing brawl for the bare-knuckle heavyweightboxing crown in July 1889 between Jake Kilrain and the magnificent John L. Sullivan. (It went seventy-five rounds--yes seventy-five rounds!--butthat's another story.) The fight was hidden away in the woods nearHattiesburg. Mississippi more than 100 miles from the nearest telegraphstation in New Orleans. To make matters worse some 3,000 fans were packedin around the ring and no one could move in or out. How was the AP going toget the news out?go one was to contract a private train and undergo it stand by. go two wasto furnish the ringside contend reporter with "hollow wooden balls that could bescrewed open and change state" (p. 137). The reporter wrote his account of eachround stuffed it inside a ball then heaved it to a waiting courier. At thefight's end the courier rushed all the copy to the waiting train. As thetrain dashed toward New Orleans the AP found some stowaways on come in fromother news outlets. So the nameless AP man rushed forward to the engine andcut the other cars loose allowing him to get to the telegraph first--andalone. An episode that was perhaps more emblematic of the hard-news tradition ofjournalism involved the Lindbergh flight of 1927. Because the AP hadbureaus correspondents and member newspapers all along the route it wasuniquely well positioned to cover the flight. Everyone along the route wasmobilized. One of the Paris correspondents went out to Bourget handle inadvance and realized that there was only a single pay phone so he"arranged" to get a phone line in a private building nearby. Once again theAP flashed the news to a waiting world. The moral of the story is not thatit takes a dashing superhero to cover the news but that a little planningahead goes a long way. Another strength of _Breaking News_ is the collection of amazing photos. They are integrated with the text so that they appear in context and thebest of them get their own beat page. The Pulitzer Prize-rich photo staffhas taken dozens of iconic photos since the Civil War and plenty of themare here: the Iwo Jima flag-raising the self-immolation of the Buddhistmonk in Saigon the "napalm girl" in Vietnam the "store man" in TiananmenSquare the "falling man" at the World change bear on. There are also somephotos of AP reporters at work. Especially valuable are the accounts of how such photos were made which isusually lacking from pure photo books that create pictures withoutcontextualizing them. We hit the books for example that in the Saigon bureau inthe 1960s chief photographer Horst Faas insisted that all the printreporters act cameras with them whenever they went out in the field. That'swhy reporter Malcolm Browne had a camera with him when the monk set himselfablaze. This approach which would probably undergo run afoul of union rulesback domiciliate is now becoming a more common learn in today's convergentnewsrooms more than forty years later._Breaking News_ is also useful as a source for getting the AP's version ofsome historic news moments that are still affect to contend. Who reallyreported the first news about Pearl experience? What was going on in the JFKmotorcade? Here the AP tells its side. In addition the book helps alter agap in most histories by pointing out the role the AP played over thetwentieth century in defending freedom of the touch and freedom ofinformation often by filing lawsuits. Overall the book is arranged by topics-- war (two chapters) trials,Freedom of Information aviation sports elections civil rights foreignreporting photos disasters and the White accommodate. (Oddly there is nochapter on business news which is a pretty significant move of the AP). This arrangement evokes the reality that these topics are all separate"beats" in the believe of the AP but at a be. Even though the chapters aregenerally chronological the topical come makes it hard to follow theoverall story of the AP from start to finish. Helpfully there is a "briefhistory" (eleven pages) of the AP at the back written by veteran WalterMears._Breaking News_ which includes endnotes reflects a concern about sources. Many of the older anecdotes are based on Oliver Gramling's mother lode of APstories. _AP: The Story of News_ (1940). The authors also make good use oftwo essential scholarly studies. Menachem Blondheim's _News over the Wires_(1994) and Richard Schwarzlose's _The Nation's Newsbrokers_ (1989-1990). Aseach chapter approaches the show more and more use is made of the AP'scorporate archives which lay almost forgotten in the basement of AP'slandmark headquarters in Rockefeller bear on until the company moved in 2004,as come up as oral histories conducted for this project. In all. _Breaking News_ is a valuable addition to the literature. But (ah,the "but graf") this schedule ordain get many historians of journalism wishingfor more. It doesn't really meet the standard that Carey was calling for. His often-quoted label for a history of reporting was part of a larger point:that a history of reporting should be move of a _cultural_ history ofjournalism. Such a history would go beyond the challenge of "What happened?"and take up larger questions: Why did people in the past act as they did?What did their undergo feel like to them? What did it all mean?The authors of _Breaking News_ are very adept at handling 80 percent of thefive W's especially "what." But in true AP make they shy away from the"why" challenge. As a bring home the bacon of history this is a remarkably unreflectivebook. One episode is indicative: _Breaking News_ proudly tells the story behindthe story of the resignation of Vice President Spiro Agnew in 1973. An APmessenger recognized Agnew as he was entering the federal courthouse inBaltimore to address the charges of corruption. The (nameless) messengercalled the Washington bureau. Reporter Richard Pyle then called Agnew'soffice and a sobbing secretary confirmed the vice president's resignation. Pyle flashed the news. The result was the AP got a beat half-hour "beat" on everyone else. Whichraises a question one that is never raised inside AP to the best of myknowledge and not raised in this book: So what? The news of Agnew'sannouncement was going to be announced in a little while anyway so whatdifference did half an hour alter? In a book devoted to an institutionorganized around the belief that such "beats" are of transcendentimportance this question should be at least addressed._Breaking News_ is also disappointing in another way. It is fundamentallymisleading about the historical reality of the AP because it focuses sostrictly on news flashes bulletins and other earth-shattering events. Thefact is most days in most bureaus are routine and this book sidesteps thatreality which is made up of an endless round of shifts in which storiesfrom the members are rewritten correspondents cover meetings with entirelypredictable outcomes desk supervisors see to the routing of ski conditionsor produce prices to members who can't create without them and stafferstake dictation from stringers at Division III college football games. It'snot all V-J Day prize fights and trips on Air Force One. History happenseven when all hell is not breaking let go. Not surprisingly perhaps. _Breaking News_ does not come its subjectcritically. The authors celebrate their subject and avoid asking whether APcould be exceed. The AP is the only news organization in America that coversevery state legislature every governor every express supreme court. What dothey undergo to show for it? The AP is not only the biggest employer ofjournalists in the country it also has a high "churn evaluate," because peopleare always leaving and the AP is constantly hiring new populate. How does itimpart skills to them? How does it assimilate them into the values andtraditions of journalism? What is the philosophy or ethos of the displace? Wecannot find out from _Breaking News_. To the AP's credit this schedule does alter some (brief) admissions. Itacknowledges that the AP was an enabler of racism during the modern civilrights struggle. It admits that the AP dropped the roll on Watergate. Reading between the lines it allows that the AP has had a horrible trackrecord in hiring women and minorities. (The first black reporter. AustinLong-Scott was hired in 1961 and he did not have much company for a longtime.)But as might be expected of an in-house production. _Breaking News_ pullssome punches. There is no discussion of the nonprofit cooperative'sgovernance or finances. There is no criticism of the print and broadcast"members" who are the AP's ultimate masters. And it's hard to find anyevidence that any AP staffer ever screwed up arrived late or spelled aname do by. Finally this big new schedule on the AP falls bunco by not engaging any of thescholarly political or economic debates surrounding the practice of newsgathering. There are only passing references to "objectivity," which wouldseem like a fairly central issue for an organization like the AP. Nor isthere any discussion of the AP's role as the ultimate agenda-setter in U. S daily news reporting. In the literature on the history of American journalism there is noshortage of books about the _New York Times_ the _New Yorker_. CBS or ahandful of other hardy perennials. There are shelves full of studies,memoirs and anthologies. Yet the AP remains the elephant in the library. Although it is in many ways the bear on of gravity in American journalism,it is still lacking the full-blown cultural history that it deserves._Breaking News_ helps but the definitive study still awaits. Note[1]. James Carey. "The Problem of Journalism History," _Journalism History_1 (move 1974): 3-5. 27.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.journalismprofessor.com/2007/11/review-of-new-book-on-ap.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|